• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Wissenschaftsrecht >Zwischen Loyalit?t und Widerstand
【24h】

Zwischen Loyalit?t und Widerstand

机译：Loyalit之间?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This year's November 18th sees the 180th anniversary of the G?ttingen Seven's protestation. In their note to the G?ttingen university's board, the professors opposed the annulation of the kingdom's constitution by King Ernst August (the Duke of Cumberland), as well as theirhaving been exonerated from their oath on the constitution of 1833. Their resulting dismissals from office – some were even banished – were met with much sympathy at the time. Posterity's judgment has been significantly influenced by historian Heinrich von Treitschke. In his judgment,Ernst August was a "law-breaker without shame or honour", the Seven, in constrast, akin to national heroes. An in-depth inspection of the legal situation leads to a different appraisal, however. Neither was the King's behaviour clearly against the law, nor was the Seven's legal viewpoint undoubtedlycorrect. The root cause of this ambiguity is constitutionalism's inability to resolve the tension between the monarchic principle and the budding parliamentary democracy in the debate concerning the question who the sovereign is in a polity.
机译：今年的11月18日看到第180周年G ?抗议。大学董事会,教授们反对环状结构的王国国王的宪法恩斯特8月(坎伯兰公爵),以及theirhaving被免除他们的誓言1833年的宪法。解雇从办公室& # 8211;放逐& # 8211;时间。明显受到历史学家海因里希冯Treitschke。“违法者没有羞耻和荣誉”7、在高对比度,类似于民族英雄。深入检查的法律情况导致然而,不同的评价。国王的行为明显违反了法律,也没有是七的法律观点undoubtedlycorrect。歧义是宪政的无力解决君主的关系紧张原理和崭露头角的议会民主在辩论中关于谁的问题主权是一个政体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号