• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Applied Ergonomics >Macroergonomic analysis of formalization in a dynamic work system
【24h】

Macroergonomic analysis of formalization in a dynamic work system

机译：动态工作系统中形式化的宏观人机工程学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Planning systems are widely accepted and used for organizational decision making, but do planning systems actually work? A simulation-based experiment was used to develop a set of indicators to measure and analyze formal and informal planning strategies. Seventy-two subjects participated, Eight planning groups of three members were assigned to a low formalization, high formalization and a control condition. Following planning strategy training, groups performed an organizational decision-making task for four simulated years. While differences in performance were not significant, significant differences in strategy were found and an interesting temporal effect was detected. In a dynamic environment, the groups exhibiting highly formalized strategies migrated in the direction of lower formalization. Results supported are discussed in terms of Mintzberg's [The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, 1994, The Free Press, New York] fallacies of planning. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. [References: 12]
机译：计划系统已被广泛接受并用于组织决策，但是计划系统确实有效吗？基于模拟的实验用于开发一组指标，以测量和分析正式和非正式的计划策略。参加了72个主题的研究，将8个由3个成员组成的计划小组分配给低形式化，高形式化和控制条件。在计划策略培训之后，各小组执行了为期四年的模拟组织决策任务。尽管性能差异不显着，但在策略上存在显着差异，并且检测到有趣的时间效应。在动态的环境中，表现出高度正规化策略的小组朝着较低正规化的方向迁移。支持的结果根据明茨伯格的《战略规划的兴衰》（1994年，纽约自由出版社）进行讨论。 （C）1998 Elsevier ScienceLtd。保留所有权利。 [参考：12]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号