...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Australian journal of rural health >Rethinking quality in qualitative research
【24h】

Rethinking quality in qualitative research

机译：在定性研究反思质量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Language is the medium in which health behaviours, policy and practice are created, perpetuated and understood. Yet in many health science disciplines, research analysing qualitative data comprises a tiny proportion of the research quantum. Too many understandings of qualitative research in the health sciences are based on the idea that it is about 'narrative thematic analyses' or 'storytelling', and that it is useful only for 'developing hypotheses not testing them'. Simplistic understandings of qualitative research do not account for the ways that theory and research practice in traditional approaches, such as critical discourse analysis, grounded theory and social ethnography, have been growing in sophistication since the 1970s, incorporating new technologies and techniques to offer greater rigour. Nor do they account for new methods combining qualitative and quantitative techniques such as case-based analysis and natural language processing. As language theory in the humanities has long suggested, interpretation, whethe of numbers or words, inevitably involves assumptions. The only choice we have is whether such interpretation will be done rigorously, making our assumptions explicit.
机译：语言是健康行为的媒介,创建政策和实践,延续和理解。学科,研究分析定性数据由一个小比例的研究量子。在健康科学的研究是基于认为它是关于的叙事主题分析”或“讲故事”,它是只有发展假设不是有用的测试它们”。定性研究不考虑方式在传统的理论和研究实践批判性话语分析等方法,扎根理论和社会人类学在复杂自1970年代以来,将新技术和技术提供更大的严谨。定性和定量相结合的方法等技术和案例分析自然语言处理。在人文学科长期以来一直认为,解释,是否成的数字或文字,不可避免地涉及到的假设。我们是这样解释严格完成,让我们假设明确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号