• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Iranian medicine >Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.
【24h】

Critical assessment of progress of medical sciences in Iran and Turkey: the way developing countries with limited resources should make effective contributions to the production of science.

机译：对伊朗和土耳其医学科学进展的批判性评估：资源有限的发展中国家应为科学生产做出有效贡献。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Scientific progress is an important indicator for the social and economic developments of any country. According to various reports, worldwide, Iran has the most growth in the field of science due to a high increase in the numbers of publications during the past decade. The aim of this study is to assess not only the quantity, but also the quality of publications of indexed Iranian journals and compare them to Turkey, as an Islamic neighboring country, in addition to the contributions of these two countries to our knowledge. A number of international journals with high impact factors were selected to assess the contributions of scientists from Iran and Turkey to the medical sciences. METHODS: English medical journals from Iran and Turkey indexed by the ISI Web of Sciences with known impact factors (IF) announced at the beginning of 2010 were included for evaluation. We calculated the number of all articles published from the beginning of 2007 until the October 2010, the number of total citations, and citations from authors outside both countries for each journal. In addition, we selected all articles cited at least six times by authors outside of both countries and discussed their content with regard to originality and novelty, as well as their contributions to current knowledge. Furthermore, 60 international journals in basic or clinical research with IF greater than 6 were selected for the magnitude of contributions of both countries to our scientific knowledge. RESULTS: In 2010, out of a total of 21 Iranian journals indexed in ISI since 2007, only 12 have a known IF with a mean of 0.39 (range: 0.07-0.97), whereas out of 28 Turkish medical journals indexed in ISI, 15 have a known IF (mean: 0.35, range: 0.05-0.82). The total number of articles published since 2007 from Iran, total citations and total citations by authors from outside Iran were 2080, 1218, and 463, respectively. The same data related to Turkish journals were 4876, 2036, and 1331, respectively. Indeed, the mean citations per article by foreign authors for Iranian and Turkish researchers were 0.19 and 0.3, respectively. Of the total articles during this period, only seven from Iran and nine from Turkey have been cited at least six times by authors outside the two countries. Iran had 23 and Turkey 37 original publications in highly reputable international journals. Turkey was more represented in basic research and clinical observational studies than Iran. CONCLUSION: Despite high numbers of published articles, both countries have medical journals with very low comparable citation rates and IF. Only one out of three Turkish articles is cited once by authors outside of Turkey and one of five Iranian articles is cited by authors outside Iran. The few high-cited articles address new therapies and interventional studies or diseases commonly encountered regionally, and are the results of the efforts of a few individuals in highly specialized fields. Turkish scientists are inclined to publish their scientific works more than Iranians in distinguished international journals. These articles deal more with regional diseases that are not common in Western countries. Developing countries can only contribute to world science when they focus their efforts on teamwork in order to research ways to solve country-specific diseases and their own health problems.
机译：背景：科学进步是任何国家社会经济发展的重要指标。根据各种报道，由于过去十年出版物数量的大量增加，伊朗在科学领域的增长最快。这项研究的目的不仅是评估被索引的伊朗期刊的数量，而且还评估其质量，并将它们与作为伊斯兰邻国的土耳其进行比较，此外这两个国家对我们的知识也有贡献。选择了许多具有高影响因子的国际期刊来评估伊朗和土耳其的科学家对医学的贡献。方法：将2010年初宣布的由ISI Web of Sciences索引，具有已知影响因子（IF）的伊朗和土耳其英语医学期刊纳入评估。我们计算了从2007年初到2010年10月发表的所有文章的数量，总引用量以及每个期刊在这两个国家/地区之外的作者的引用次数。此外，我们选择了两国以外的作者至少引用过六次的所有文章，并讨论了它们在原创性和新颖性方面的内容以及它们对当前知识的贡献。此外，我们还选择了60个IF大于6的基础或临床研究国际期刊，以评估两国对我们科学知识的贡献程度。结果：2010年以来，自2007年以来在ISI索引的21种伊朗期刊中，只有12种具有已知的IF，平均值为0.39（范围：0.07-0.97），而在ISI索引的28种土耳其医学期刊中，有15种具有已知的IF（平均值：0.35，范围：0.05-0.82）。自2007年以来，伊朗发表的文章总数，来自伊朗境外的作者的总引用次数和总引用次数分别为2080、1218和463。与土耳其期刊相关的相同数据分别为4876、2036和1331。实际上，外国作者对伊朗和土耳其研究人员的每篇文章的平均引用分别为0.19和0.3。在此期间的全部文章中，两国以外的作者至少被六次引用来自伊朗的七篇文章和来自土耳其的九篇文章。在享有盛誉的国际期刊上，伊朗拥有23种原始出版物，土耳其拥有37种原始出版物。土耳其在基础研究和临床观察研究中的代表比伊朗更多。结论：尽管发表的文章数量很高，但两国的医学期刊的可比引用率和IF都非常低。土耳其以外的作者只引用了三分之二的土耳其文章，伊朗以外的作者只引用了五分伊朗的文章。鲜为人知的几篇文章介绍了新疗法和干预性研究或本地区常见的疾病，这是少数人在高度专业化领域的努力的结果。土耳其科学家倾向于在杰出的国际杂志上发表比伊朗人更多的科学著作。这些文章更多地讨论了在西方国家不常见的区域性疾病。发展中国家只有集中精力进行团队合作，以研究解决特定国家的疾病及其自身健康问题的方法，才能为世界科学做出贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号