...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australasian journal on ageing >Age-friendly buses? A comparison of reported barriers and facilitators to bus use for younger and older adults.
【24h】

Age-friendly buses? A comparison of reported barriers and facilitators to bus use for younger and older adults.

机译：适合年龄的巴士？比较报道的年轻人和老年人使用公交车的障碍和促进者。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Aim: To determine whether older people reported and prioritised different barriers and facilitators to bus use than younger people. Method: The Nominal Group Technique was used with 301 participants (231 older, 70 younger) to elicit reported barriers and facilitators to bus use. Categories were developed using qualitative content analysis and comparisons of categories and priorities were made. Results: Driver friendliness, ease of entry/exit and information useability were prioritised barriers and facilitators for older people. In contrast, younger participants prioritised bus punctuality, signage clarity, information provision at bus stops, bus service availability and parking facilities at the bus stop. Some similarities between older and younger adults were noted relating to convenience and bus scheduling. Conclusions: Older and younger adults have specific requirements for public transport systems which should be addressed in order to promote useable transport for all.
机译：目的：确定老年人是否报告并优先考虑与年轻人相比不同的障碍和促进公交使用的因素。方法：名义组技术与301名参与者（年龄231岁，年龄70岁）一起使用，以引起报道的障碍和促进公交使用的因素。使用定性内容分析来开发类别，并对类别和优先级进行比较。结果：驾驶员的友善，进出的便利性和信息的实用性是老年人的优先障碍和促进者。相反，年轻的参与者优先考虑公交车的守时性，标牌清晰度，公交车站的信息提供，公交服务的可用性以及公交车站的停车设施。注意到老年人和年轻人之间在便利性和公交时刻表方面存在一些相似之处。结论：老年人对公共交通系统有特定的要求，应解决这些要求，以促进所有人都能使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号