首页> 外文期刊>Australian Geomechanics >SLOPE INSTABILITY - MANAGING THE RISK A REGULATOR'S PERSPECTIVE
【24h】

SLOPE INSTABILITY - MANAGING THE RISK A REGULATOR'S PERSPECTIVE

机译:边坡不稳定-管理风险监管者的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The WoUongong City Local Government Area has records of slope instability dating back to early settlement. Following very rapid growth of the city in the post war years there was little good developable land left and marginal land became progressively more attractive to developers. In 1974 and 1975 periods of prolonged as well as very intense rainfall resulted in extensive hillside instability. Many houses were lost and litigation followed. As consent authority and without clear guidelines on the development of hillside land Council fared poorly in court. In response, Council quickly sought and received legal advice with respect to what it needed to do to fulfil its legal responsibilities and duties as the consent authority. The legal advice made it very clear that Council is exposed to actionable negligence where it fails to consider whether the land to be developed has potential slope instability. The legal advice also stated that Council may seek a review by its engineers of the basic facts of the submitted geotechnical information and to set appropriate geotechnical conditions to be applied to the development. On this basis Council is entitled to rely on the submitted geotechnical information and any claim would be unlikely to succeed. It is pointed out that in undertaking this review Council does not have a responsibility to provide professional advice but at the same time must avoid being negligent. The success of WoUongong City Council's geotechnical review process has been demonstrated by Council's minimal legal costs on geotechnical aspects of development since the 1970s.
机译:WoUongong市地方政府区域有可追溯到早期沉降的边坡失稳记录。战后几年,随着城市的快速发展,几乎没有可开发的土地可供使用,边际土地对开发商的吸引力逐渐增强。在1974年和1975年,长时间降雨以及强烈降雨导致了广泛的山坡不稳定。许多房屋丢失了,诉讼随之而来。作为同意授权机构,没有明确的山坡土地开发准则,理事会在法庭上的表现不佳。作为回应,理事会迅速寻求并接受了法律意见,以了解履行其作为同意授权机构的法律责任和义务所需采取的措施。法律咨询意见非常明确地表明,安理会在不考虑将要开发的土地是否具有潜在的边坡不稳定性的情况下会遭受可诉的过失。法律意见还指出,理事会可要求其工程师对所提交的岩土信息的基本事实进行审查,并设定适用于该开发项目的适当岩土条件。在此基础上,理事会有权依赖所提交的岩土信息,任何索赔都不太可能成功。需要指出的是,在进行这次审查时,理事会没有责任提供专业建议,但同时必须避免疏忽大意。自1970年代以来,议会在发展的岩土工程方面的最低法律费用证明了伍农公市议会的岩土工程审查程序的成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号