...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Australian journal of herbal medicine >Patterns of inter-professional communication between complementary and conventional practitioners providing maternity care services: a preliminary examination of the perceptions of CAM practitioner
【24h】

Patterns of inter-professional communication between complementary and conventional practitioners providing maternity care services: a preliminary examination of the perceptions of CAM practitioner

机译：提供产妇保健服务的辅助从业人员与传统从业人员之间的专业间沟通模式：对CAM执业者的看法的初步检查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Inter-professional communication is well acknowledged as a vital piece in the practice of multi-disciplinary health care. Yet, even in health sectors such as maternity care where high rates of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use are well documented, there is little examination of the inter-professional communication patterns between CAM and conventional care providers. This study reports preliminary findings from a survey of CAM practitioners (n=31) which examines their perceived interprofessional communication patterns with conventional maternity care providers. The results indicate CAM practitioners may provide care to women from preconception care through to the postnatal period. The practitioners were most likely to receive referrals from other women or previous clients (sometimes: 41%; often 27%), rather than from health professionals. Formal communication was most likely to be directed to other CAM practitioners (sometimes: 18%; often: 4%) and least likely to be directed to obstetricians (sometimes: 0%; often: 4%). No participants reported receiving formal communications from obstetricians but a small number indicated receiving formal communication from midwives (sometimes: 7%; often: 4%) and other CAM practitioners (sometimes: 17%; often: 4%). These low rates of communication may be impacting on patient safety through overtreatment or therapeutic interactions. There are concerns that policy and legislative barriers may be limiting the inter-professional communication practices of conventional care providers. Similarly, educational and regulatory weaknesses in CAM may be contributing to poor inter-professional communication practices for CAM practitioners. Further substantive research is needed to contextualise and verify these findings.
机译：专业间的交流是公认的多学科医疗保健实践中至关重要的部分。然而，即使在诸如妇产保健这样的保健部门中，辅助和替代医学（CAM）的高使用率已被充分记录，对CAM与​​传统护理提供者之间的专业间沟通模式也很少进行检查。这项研究报告了一项对CAM从业者的调查（n = 31）的初步发现，该调查检查了他们与传统孕妇护理提供者之间的专业间沟通模式。结果表明，CAM从业人员可能从孕前保健一直到产后期间为妇女提供护理。从业人员最有可能从其他女性或以前的客户那里获得转诊（有时：41％;通常为27％），而不是健康专业人员。正式交流最有可能针对其他CAM从业者（有时：18％;经常：4％），最不可能针对妇产科医生（有时：0％;经常：4％）。没有参与者报告接受过妇产科医生的正式通信，但少数人表示接受了助产士（有时：7％;经常：4％）和其他CAM从业者（有时：17％;经常：4％）的正式通信。这些低沟通率可能会通过过度治疗或治疗相互作用而影响患者安全。令人担忧的是，政策和立法壁垒可能会限制常规护理提供者的跨行业交流实践。同样，CAM的教育和监管弱点可能会导致CAM从业人员跨专业的交流实践不佳。需要进一步的实质性研究，以情境化和验证这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号