...
【24h】

Abuse of dental privilege.

机译:滥用牙科特权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sir, I write in relation to Stephen Hancocks' assertion that there is no involvement with hackers or hacking at the BDJ. Sadly, based on the current evidence, I must disagree. In the recent past, in the BDJ and other dental publications, I have seen examples of blatant hacking of sound tooth enamel apparently being undertaken to 'treat' minor cosmetic or wear problems. I read these articles with mounting horror as relatively innocent looking teeth are massacred on the altar of porcelain veneers. This often appears to be done because these healthy teeth have dared to lose a few microns of surface enamel or may have had the temerity to exhibit minor irregularities in their shape, colour or positions.
机译:主席先生,我写关于斯蒂芬·汉考克斯的断言,即不涉及黑客或BDJ的黑客。可悲的是,根据目前的证据,我必须不同意。最近,在BDJ和其他牙科出版物中,我看到了一些明显的例子,这些例子显然是为了“治疗”轻微的化妆品或磨损问题而对公道的牙釉质进行明显的砍伐。我读这些文章时都感到恐惧,因为在陶瓷贴面的祭坛上,相对无辜的牙齿被屠杀了。之所以经常这样做,是因为这些健康的牙齿不敢失去几微米的表面珐琅质,或者可能在形状,颜色或位置上表现出轻微的不规则性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号