...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Reply to 'Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients?'
【24h】

Reply to 'Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients?'

机译:回复“ FAST考试在重伤患者中是否可靠?”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dear Prof. Wiwanitkit,Thank you for your valuable response to the manuscript "Is the FAST exam reliable in severely injured patients?". It is commonly agreed that FAST has an important role as a primary diagnostic tool in hypotensive patients with blunt trauma. In many trauma centers, FAST has become an integral part of the primary assessment of patients with blunt trauma. Many investigators concluded that FAST, which has the primary role of detecting free fluid as a marker of injury, is a very useful and safe modality. On the other hand, it is very important to know the limitations of this diagnostic tool in different clinical settings (e.g. blunt abdominal trauma and pelvic, rib and spinal fractures, existence of subcutaneous emphysema, etc.). We found that FAST, in stable blunt trauma patients with high grade injury, has low accuracy and cannot be used as a sole modality to exclude intra-abdominal injury in this cohort of trauma patients.
机译:尊敬的Wiwanitkit教授,谢谢您对“ FAST考试在重伤患者中是否可靠?”的宝贵回应。人们普遍认为,FAST作为低血压钝性创伤患者的主要诊断工具具有重要作用。在许多创伤中心,FAST已成为对钝性创伤患者进行初步评估的重要组成部分。许多研究人员得出结论,FAST主要作用是检测游离液作为损伤的标志,是一种非常有用且安全的方法。另一方面,了解此诊断工具在不同临床环境中的局限性非常重要(例如,腹部钝伤和骨盆,肋骨和脊柱骨折,皮下气肿的存在等)。我们发现,FAST在患有高水平损伤的稳定的钝性外伤患者中,准确性较低,并且不能用作排除该外伤患者队列中腹部内损伤的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号