首页> 外文期刊>International Food and Agribusiness Management Review >Land Rights and Their Impacts on Agricultural Efficiency, Investmentsand Land Markets in Zimbabwe
【24h】

Land Rights and Their Impacts on Agricultural Efficiency, Investmentsand Land Markets in Zimbabwe

机译:津巴布韦的土地权及其对农业效率,投资和土地市场的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper summarizes results of case studies and panel group discussions carriedout in Zimbabwe recently to find out the relationship between land rights andagricultural efficiency, investment and land markets in the smallholder agriculturalsector. Results indicate that primary land user rights holders in the three perceivedland tenure categories studied do not see security of tenure as a major problem. Themajor limiting factors cited as reasons for failure to realize full agriculturalproduction potential include lack of or problem with one of the following: draftpower, labor, credit, rural-urban migration and the AIDS pandemic among others.The opposite is true of secondary user rights holders such as grown up sons livingwith parents and some women and other social weak groups who indicate tenureinsecurity as a problem of equal magnitude to the other limitations stated above.The results also show some relationship between investment and land rightsbetween the small-scale commercial farming sector and the other two sectors(resettlement and communal). Total credit received is not significantly related tothe form of land rights enjoyed by landowners. Land markets in the three categoriesare thin and ‘transaction costs’ are high limiting the amount of agricultural landthat changed hands. Women access to and control over land, and their bargainingpower with their husbands and relatives about land are weak across the threecategories studied.
机译:本文总结了最近在津巴布韦进行的案例研究和小组讨论的结果,以发现小农农业部门的土地权与农业效率,投资和土地市场之间的关系。结果表明,研究的三个感知土地使用权类别中的主要土地使用者权利持有者并不认为土地使用权安全是一个主要问题。被认为是无法实现全部农业生产潜力的主要原因的主要限制因素包括以下方面之一的缺乏或存在问题:草稿力量,劳动力,信贷,城乡移民和艾滋病大流行等。二手使用者权利持有人则相反例如,与父母同住的成年儿子以及一些妇女和其他社会弱势群体,则表明终身制不安全与上述其他限制同样严重。研究结果还表明,小型商业化农业部门之间的投资与土地权利之间存在一定关系。其他两个部门(安置和公共部门)。获得的信贷总额与土地所有者享有的土地权利的形式没有显着关系。这三类土地市场都很薄弱,“交易成本”很高,限制了易手的农业用地数量。在所研究的三个类别中,妇女获得和控制土地的能力以及与丈夫和亲戚就土地的议价能力很弱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号