...
首页> 外文期刊>Information Services & Use >Open Publishing: How publishers are reacting
【24h】

Open Publishing: How publishers are reacting

机译:开放式发布:发布者的反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Publishers are all in favour of maximising access to works of scholarship; it's good for authors, and it's good for journals. Open Access is not all or nothing-there are a variety of ways in which publishers can increase access to journals: licensing, archival access, author agreements, deals for less developed countries, not to mention the Open Access business model. However, publishing costs money (even electronic publication does not reduce costs dramatically), and the costs need to be recovered somehow. Placing content in freely accessible open archives without having an alternative cost-recovery model in place could be disastrous, for journals are genuinely valuable to the scholarly community. Moving towards the Open Access model may be attractive, but it's not simple.
机译:出版商都赞成最大限度地利用奖学金;这对作者和期刊都是有益的。开放获取并非全部或没有-出版商可以通过多种方式增加对期刊的访问:许可,档案访问,作者协议,欠发达国家的交易,更不用说开放访问业务模型了。但是,出版要花钱(即使电子出版也不能大幅度降低成本),并且需要以某种方式收回成本。在没有适当的成本回收模型的情况下将内容放置在可自由访问的开放档案中可能会造成灾难性的后果,因为期刊对学术界而言确实是有价值的。转向开放访问模型可能很有吸引力,但这并不简单。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号