• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Human-wildlife conflicts and management options in Bangladesh, with special reference to Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
【24h】

Human-wildlife conflicts and management options in Bangladesh, with special reference to Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)

机译：孟加拉国的野生动物冲突和管理选择，特别是亚洲象（Elephas maximus）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this study, we explored the interaction between humans and Asian elephants {Elephas maximus). We analysed local mitigation techniques and propose possible measures to reduce human-elephant conflicts. For four protected areas in Bangladesh, we investigated how people interact with elephants and other crop-damaging species. Crop-damaging species differed from site to site, but elephants were generally the most frequent offenders. Although some people were able to control crop damage caused by otherwildlife, damage caused by wild elephants was mostly uncontrollable. Forest villagers were somewhat tolerant of damage caused by other wildlife but they were not tolerant of damage caused by wild elephants. Tolerance of crop damage caused by wildlife other than wild elephants tended to increase with distance of respondents from protected areas. Non-tolerance of crop damage caused by wildlife was more common in southeast Bangladesh than in the north. Habitat destruction, caused by high population growthand poverty, appeared to be a major cause for increasing human-elephant conflict. There is an urgent need for adoption of an umbrella strategy (e.g. estimate the size of elephant populations, develop landscape-scale conservation plans and create forest buffer zones under community-based natural resource management schemes) in the use of conflict mitigation as a conservation tool for Asian elephants.
机译：在这项研究中，我们探索了人类与亚洲象（Elephas maximus）之间的相互作用。我们分析了本地缓解技术，并提出了减少人与大象冲突的可能措施。对于孟加拉国的四个保护区，我们调查了人们如何与大象和其他破坏农作物的物种互动。各地对作物造成伤害的物种有所不同，但大象通常是最常见的罪犯。尽管有些人能够控制其他野生动植物造成的农作物损害，但野生象造成的损害大多数是无法控制的。森林村民可以容忍其他野生动植物造成的破坏，但不能容忍野生象造成的破坏。由野生象以外的其他野生生物造成的农作物损害的容忍度随着受访者离保护区的距离的增加而增加。孟加拉国东南部比北部对野生动植物造成的农作物损害的不宽容更为普遍。高人口增长和贫穷造成的人居破坏似乎是加剧人与大象冲突的主要原因。迫切需要采用总体战略（例如，估计大象种群的数量，制定景观规模的保护计划并根据基于社区的自然资源管理计划创建森林缓冲区），以将冲突缓解作为一种保护工具为亚洲象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号