...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of developmental science >Not Breaking Bonds on Facebook-Mixed- Methods Research on the Influence of Individuals' Need to Belong on 'Unfriending'Behavior on Facebook
【24h】

Not Breaking Bonds on Facebook-Mixed- Methods Research on the Influence of Individuals' Need to Belong on 'Unfriending'Behavior on Facebook

机译:在Facebook上保持不折不扣的混合方式-关于个人需要归属于Facebook上“不交往”行为影响的方法研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although recent research demonstrates that people deem a considerable number of their Facebook friends dispensable, they nevertheless refrain from deleting a large number of contacts. While there are first studies on the reasons why users decide to "unfriend" contacts, there is no research on the motives for keeping social contacts even though they are identified as deletable. Based on assumptions of the need to belong theory (Baumeister & Leary, 1995),we conducted two exploratory studies (an interview study, 18, and a subsequent online survey, N=255).to determine reasons for refraining from deleting dispensable contacts. A think-aloud element in the interviews confirmed that participants were willing and able to identify dispensable contacts but that only a minor proportion of these were actually deleted. Reasons for not deleting were related first and foremost to the relationship and the fear of eventually losing the possibility for contact. The online survey demonstrated that the individual need to belong predicts the number of friends but not the number of friends that have already been deleted.
机译:尽管最近的研究表明,人们认为他们的Facebook朋友是可有可无的,但他们还是避免删除大量联系人。尽管有一些关于用户决定“取消好友”联系的原因的初步研究,但是,即使被确定为可删除的社交联系,其动机仍未得到研究。基于需要归属理论的假设(Baumeister&Leary,1995),我们进行了两项探索性研究(访谈研究18,随后的在线调查,N = 255),以确定避免删除可有可无联系的原因。访谈中的思想思考要素证实,参与者愿意并能够确定必要的联系,但实际上只有一小部分被删除。不删除的原因首先与恋爱关系有关,与担心最终失去联系的可能性有关。在线调查显示,个人的归属需要预测朋友的数量,而不是已经删除的朋友的数量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号