• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British Journal of Management >The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics?
【24h】

The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics?

机译：英国大学研究质量评估：同行评议还是衡量指标？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper investigates the extent to which the outcomes of the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK, determined by peer review, can be explained by a set of quantitative indicators. Three cognate units of assessment are examined in detail: business and management, economics and econometrics, and accounting and finance. The main finding is that each of the three components of research activity (namely, research output, esteem and research environment) is highly correlated with various quantitative indicators. A further finding is that the judgement of the Research Assessment Exercise panels was biased in favour of Russell Group universities. There is also evidence of bias by the economics and econometrics panel. The results support the use of quantitative indicators in the research assessment process, particularly a journal quality index. Requiring the panels to take bibliometric indicators into account should help not only to reduce the workload of panels but also to mitigate the problem of implicit bias.
机译：本文研究了由同行评审确定的英国2008年研究评估活动的结果在多大程度上可以通过一套定量指标来解释。详细评估了三个相关的评估单位：业务和管理，经济学和计量经济学以及会计和金融。主要发现是研究活动的三个组成部分（即研究成果，自尊和研究环境）中的每一个都与各种量化指标高度相关。进一步的发现是，研究评估练习小组的判断偏向于罗素集团大学。经济学和计量经济学小组也有偏见的证据。结果支持在研究评估过程中使用定量指标，特别是期刊质量指数。要求专家组考虑文献计量指标，不仅应有助于减少专家组的工作量，而且还可以减轻内在偏见的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号