...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >HOW PRODUCTIVE IS AUTOMATION INVESTMENT - EVIDENCE AND RESULTS FROM THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TAIWAN
【24h】

HOW PRODUCTIVE IS AUTOMATION INVESTMENT - EVIDENCE AND RESULTS FROM THE MANUFACTURING SECTOR IN TAIWAN

机译：自动化投资的生产效率-台湾制造业的证据和结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Study findings conducted at the macro level using aggregate industry data or at the micro level using firm level data, have not shown convincing evidence that investment in automation will improve productivity and provide high enough return on investment. Problems of mismeasurements, mismanagement, time lags, and redistribution of profit may account for part of the reasons for the so-called 'productivity paradox'. Complexity, interactions, mixtures of strategic and operational issues makes it extremely difficult to isolate the effect of automation investment even at the firm or enterprise level. This empirical study is based on a survey conducted by the Statistics Division, Ministry of Economic Affairs in Taiwan on the status of automation in the manufacturing sector at the factory level that allows a better resolution of productivity. Two variations of the Cobb-Douglas are specified to model the production function of the 18 industries in the manufacturing sector. The results show that automation investment provides high enough return on investment (ROI) and return on productivity (ROP). Cross industry analysis indicates that for those industries with higher output capital ratios, the ROI and ROP will also be higher. Investment in automation may provide synergistic effect, if it will improve the output-capital ratio of the automation capital that in turn will lead to increasing ROI and ROP for both the automation and non-automation capital. [References: 14]
机译：在宏观层面上使用汇总的行业数据或在微观层面上使用公司级别的数据进行的研究结果，还没有显示出令人信服的证据表明对自动化的投资将提高生产率并提供足够高的投资回报率。度量错误，管理不善，时间滞后和利润重新分配的问题可能是造成所谓“生产力悖论”的部分原因。复杂性，相互作用，战略和运营问题的混合，即使在公司或企业级别，也很难隔离自动化投资的效果。这项实证研究基于台湾经济部统计司进行的一项调查，该调查涉及工厂级别的制造业自动化状况，可以更好地解决生产率问题。指定了Cobb-Douglas的两个变体来模拟制造业18个行业的生产功能。结果表明，自动化投资可提供足够高的投资回报率（ROI）和生产率回报率（ROP）。跨行业分析表明，对于具有较高产出资本比的行业，ROI和ROP也将更高。如果可以提高自动化资本的产出资本比率，从而提高自动化资本和非自动化资本的ROI和ROP，则对自动化投资可以产生协同效应。 [参考：14]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号