• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Technology Management: The Journal of the Technology Management of Technology, Engineering Management, Technology Policy and Strategy >Citizens, engineers and air toxics: citizen participation in technology based standard setting
【24h】

Citizens, engineers and air toxics: citizen participation in technology based standard setting

机译：公民，工程师和空气中的毒物：公民参与基于技术的标准制定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article analyses the potential for involving state and local citizen groups in technology-based standard setting for air toxics under the 1990 US Clean Air Act. Congress hoped that by focusing on technology rather than risk that the standard setting process would be Less contentious. This has not turned out to be the case. There are a number of points where scientists and engineers make choices between several technologically defensible options. Their judgments have implications for the stringency and the costs of implementing a standard. It is at these points of judgment that all parties - citizen groups and industry - want to have a say. The article identifies places where citizens could be included in standard setting. The article highlights underlying strategies to consider when involving citizens, and suggests specific participatory techniques for including citizens in air toxics standard setting. While the article focuses on air toxics the issues it raises about citizen participation are applicable to other federal standard setting activities. [References: 11]
机译：本文分析了根据1990年《美国清洁空气法案》，州和地方公民团体参与基于技术的空气毒物标准制定的可能性。大会希望通过专注于技术而不是冒险，标准制定过程将减少争议。事实并非如此。在许多方面，科学家和工程师可以在几种技术上可行的选择之间做出选择。他们的判断对实施标准的严格性和成本有影响。在这些判断点上，所有各方-公民团体和行业-都想发表意见。本文确定了可以将公民纳入标准设置的地方。文章重点介绍了让公民参与时应考虑的基本策略，并提出了将公民纳入空气毒物标准制定过程中的特定参与技术。尽管本文重点关注空气中的有毒物质，但它引起的公民参与问题也适用于其他联邦标准制定活动。 [参考：11]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号