...
【24h】

Networks of venture capital firms in Silicon Valley

机译:硅谷的风险投资公司网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

By comparing the network structure of venture capital (VC) firms in Silicon Valley (California) to that of VC firms in Route 128 (Massachusetts), the present study challenges any market-centred theory of regional development. I show that there are advantages in examining the structure of social networks of cooperation within the venture capital industry to understand the level of development of a region. I support two distinctive propositions regarding the regional advantage of Silicon Valley over other US high-technology regions such as Route 128. First, collaboration among VC firms in Silicon Valley is more pronounced and dense than in Route 128. Second, the number of investments and amount of money invested by VCs in Silicon Valley staying local are much higher than the number of investments and moneys invested locally by Route 128 VC firms. I argue that historical development as well as the particular structure of the social networks in Silicon Valley is precisely what has fostered relatively higher growth and development of the region compared to many other regions of the world. [References: 28]
机译:通过比较硅谷(加利福尼亚州)的风险投资(VC)公司的网络结构与128号公路(马萨诸塞州)的风险投资公司的网络结构,本研究对任何以市场为中心的区域发展理论提出了挑战。我表明,检查风险投资行业内合作的社会网络结构以了解某个地区的发展水平是有好处的。对于硅谷相对于其他美国高科技区域(例如128号公路)的区域优势,我支持两个独特的主张。首先,​​与128号公路相比,硅谷的风险投资公司之间的合作更加明显和密集。第二,投资数量和在硅谷留在本地的风险投资人投资的金额远远高于Route 128风险投资公司在当地投资的金额。我认为,与世界上许多其他地区相比,硅谷的历史发展以及社交网络的特殊结构正是该地区相对较高的增长和发展的原因。 [参考:28]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号