...
【24h】

Towards the post-Fordist economy: emerging organizational models [Review]

机译:迈向后福特经济:新兴的组织模式[评论]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using a vast interdisciplinary literature, this paper discusses the transition to the post-Fordist economy, as an unavoidable trend, which affects individual organizations and countries. One of the great dangers of the current debate about post-Fordism is the overlapping of the various levels of discussion. The absence of rigour in posing the question has confused abstract reasoning (the outline of scenarios) with the process of demonstration (the utilization of concrete, supporting data to validate the theory). This survey is essentially dedicated to the former question, leaving aside the latter (thus, the very complex issue of finding neutral data, nationally unbiased, to test it empirically). In our view post-Fordism is an organizational paradigm (guidelines for new principles), not a realized model. Nor will it ever be one, since our hypothesis maintains that institutions matter, and that historical modifications of firms/industries/countries are the result of hybridization and complex co-evolution. This article discusses, in fact, the nature of change implied by the post-Fordist paradigm only in relation to four abstract domains: its model of labour regulation, its organization of production, its firm organizational model, and its societal and spatial context. [References: 140]
机译:本文使用大量的跨学科文献,讨论了向后福特经济过渡的趋势,这是不可避免的趋势,会影响各个组织和国家。当前有关后福特主义的辩论的最大危险之一是各个层次讨论的重叠。提出问题时缺乏严谨性,已经使抽象推理(场景的轮廓)与演示过程(利用具体的支持数据来验证理论)相混淆。这项调查本质上是针对前一个问题的,而撇开了后者(因此,找到中立的数据这一非常复杂的问题,在全国范围内是无偏见的,以进行实证检验)。在我们看来,后福特主义是一种组织范式(新原则的指南),而不是一种实现的模型。因为我们的假设仍然认为制度很重要,并且公司/行业/国家的历史变迁是杂交和复杂的共同进化的结果,所以也永远不会是一个。本文实际上讨论了后福特主义范式所隐含的变化的本质,它仅涉及四个抽象领域:其劳动监管模型,其生产组织,其牢固的组织模型以及其社会和空间环境。 [参考:140]

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号