• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Irrigation and Drainage Systems >Is IWRM achievable in practice? Attempts to break disciplinary and sectoral walls through a science-policy interfacing framework in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive. (Special Issue: Integrated water resources management.)
【24h】

Is IWRM achievable in practice? Attempts to break disciplinary and sectoral walls through a science-policy interfacing framework in the context of the EU Water Framework Directive. (Special Issue: Integrated water resources management.)

机译：在实践中可以实现IWRM吗？在欧盟水框架指令的背景下，试图通过科学政策接口框架打破学科和部门壁垒。 （特刊：水资源综合管理。）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The word 'integrated' is prone to different interpretations in relation to various disciplines and sectors. When approaching operational water management, one would dream that integration would encompass effective links between scientific disciplines and technical features, with a good knowledge of interactions among different environmental compartments (land/water, terrestrial/coastal, surface/groundwater etc.), of pollution pathways, of various pressures and impacts (including from climate change) etc. The world of management effectively involves many different actors, representing different economic sectors (e.g. agriculture, industry), the civil society, stakeholder organisations, including the representation of citizens, and it is often (wrongly) thought that any kind of decision-making is carried out in an agreed and harmonious way. The theory is at least paved through IWRM principles as they are conceived within the framework of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD), so we might say that we have actually no choice but to make it work!! But what is the reality in practice? The difficulty is to consider mandatory policy obligations on the one side, technical feasibility and scientific knowledge on the other side, and reflect whether and how these can be properly interfaced. This has been the subject of dynamic discussions within the past 6 years in the framework of EU-funded research projects aiming to support policy WFD developments and implementation. One of the key conclusions of these discussions among scientists, policy-makers and stakeholders underlined the need to develop a conceptual framework for a science-policy interface related to water, which would enable to gather various initiatives and knowledge. This paper discusses on-going developments in this field with an European perspective.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10795-010-9102-x
机译：“集成”一词对各个学科和部门的解释容易不同。在进行业务用水管理时，人们会梦想着整合将包括科学学科和技术特征之间的有效联系，并且对污染的不同环境部分（土地/水，陆地/沿海，地表/地下水等）之间的相互作用有充分的了解。各种压力和影响（包括来自气候变化的压力和影响）等各种途径。管理世界有效地涉及许多不同的参与者，代表不同的经济部门（例如农业，工业），民间社会，利益相关者组织，包括公民代表，以及人们常常（错误地）认为，任何一种决策都是以协商一致和和谐的方式进行的。该理论至少是通过IWRM原则铺平的，因为它们是在欧盟水框架指令（WFD）框架内构想的，所以我们可以说我们实际上别无选择，只能使它发挥作用！！但是实际情况是什么？困难在于一方面要考虑强制性政策义务，另一方面要考虑技术可行性和科学知识，并反映出是否以及如何将它们正确地联系起来。在过去的6年中，这一直是欧盟资助的旨在支持WFD政策制定和实施的研究项目框架中动态讨论的主题。科学家，政策制定者和利益相关者之间的这些讨论的主要结论之一强调，有必要为与水有关的科学政策互动机制开发概念框架，这将有助于收集各种倡议和知识。本文从欧洲的角度讨论了该领域的最新发展。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10795-010-9102-x

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号