• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>East Asian science, technology and society: an international journal >Yi-bing Fang方—兵，Zhongri jindai gangtie jishushi bijiao yanjiu: 1868-1933中日近代鋼鐵技術史比較研究： 1868-1933 [The History of Iron and Steel Technology in Modern China and Japan, 1868-1933: A Comparative Study] China: Shandong Education Press, 2013. 283 pp. RMB ￥ 50.
【24h】

Yi-bing Fang方—兵，Zhongri jindai gangtie jishushi bijiao yanjiu: 1868-1933中日近代鋼鐵技術史比較研究： 1868-1933 [The History of Iron and Steel Technology in Modern China and Japan, 1868-1933: A Comparative Study] China: Shandong Education Press, 2013. 283 pp. RMB ￥ 50.

机译：Yi-bing Fang方—兵，Zhongri jindai gangtie jishushi bijiao yanjiu: 1868-1933中日近代钢铁技术史比较研究： 1868-1933 [The History of Iron and Steel Technology in Modern China and Japan, 1868-1933: A Comparative Study] China: Shandong Education Press, 2013. 283 pp. RMB ￥ 50.

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

During the 1860s，industrialization movements arose independently in China and Japan, while new iron- and steelmaking processes began to be transferred from the West to East Asia. Despite their similar beginnings, the fates of those two countries' industries were very different after decades of development: China's iron industry was almost destroyed with the closure of the Hanyehping Company (漢冶萍公司）in the 1930s, while at the same time Japan's played an important role during the successful industrialization process from the Meiji Period on, becoming the economic foundation for the invasion of Japan's neighbors. What then had happened in these two countries? Yi-bing Fang's 2013 book，The History of Iron and Steel Technology in Modern China and Japan, 1868-1933: A Comparative Study (in Prof. Baichun Zhang's 張柏春History of Technology Transfer and Innovation series)，has given us excellent insight into the transfer of modern technology in East Asia almost a century ago. Fang, pointing out how useful this particular example will prove in studying technological modernization in the region, states in the preface that it “will supply us with a good case for further discussion of the different characters of technical and industrial modernization in China and Japan，through detailed research and a comparison of the history of technology transfer and development in the two countries" (2).
机译：在1860年代，中国和日本独立地进行了工业化运动，同时新的钢铁制造工艺开始从西方转移到东亚。尽管两国起步相似，但经过数十年的发展，两国工业的命运却截然不同：随着1930年代汉冶萍公司的倒闭，中国的钢铁工业几乎被摧毁了，而日本从明治时代开始，在成功的工业化进程中发挥了重要作用，成为侵略日本邻国的经济基础，这两个国家发生了什么呢？方以兵2013年出版的《钢铁技术史》（日本） 1868-1933年的近代中国与日本：一项比较研究（在张百春教授的张柏春技术转移与创新历史丛书中），使我们对近一个世纪前东亚的现代技术转移有了很好的了解。在序言中指出，“这个特殊的例子将为研究该地区的技术现代化提供多大的用处，它将为我们提供进一步讨论的良好案例”。通过详细研究并比较两国技术转让和发展的历史，探讨中日两国技术和工业现代化的不同特征”（2）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号