首页> 外文期刊>Economic bulletin >The Scope of Allocation -Differences in Concepts and Results
【24h】

The Scope of Allocation -Differences in Concepts and Results

机译:分配范围-概念和结果的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Public debate on the right level of wage demands is vigorous in Germany. Employers usually argue that too high demands will cost jobs, while unions argue that higher wages are needed to stimulate demand. Thus, the scope available for wage increases that will not lead to cuts in jobs needs to be determined to evaluate whether wage demands are actually too high or not. This paper shows some possible ways of deriving that scope of allocation and at the same time tests these in a multi-country comparison. The conclusion is that small changes in the derivation lead to large changes in the outcome in terms of the multi-country comparison. It is not possible to derive a unique procedure to classify a wage policy as employment enhancing or restricting using the scope of allocation since a different but equally valid derivation might lead to an opposite conclusion.
机译:在德国,关于工资要求的正确水平的公开辩论非常激烈。雇主通常认为,过高的需求会导致工作机会减少,而工会则认为,需要更高的工资来刺激需求。因此,需要确定不会导致裁员的工资增长幅度,以评估工资需求实际上是否过高。本文展示了得出分配范围的一些可能方法,同时在多国比较中对它们进行了测试。结论是,就多国比较而言,微分的变化会导致结果的较大变化。不可能得出一个独特的程序来使用分配范围将工资政策分类为增加就业或限制就业,因为不同但同样有效的推导可能得出相反的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号