...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >The Wilderness Act and fish stocking: An overview of legislation, judicialinterpretation, and agency implementation
【24h】

The Wilderness Act and fish stocking: An overview of legislation, judicialinterpretation, and agency implementation

机译：《荒野法》和鱼类种群：立法，司法解释和机构实施概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many high-elevation lakes in designated wilderness are stocked with native and nonnative fish by state fish and Same agencies to provide recreational fishing opportunities. In several areas, this practice has become controversial with state wildlife managers who support historical recreational use of wilderness, federal wilderness managers who assert that stocking compromises some of the ecological and social values of wilderness, and different public groups that support one or the other position. Herein we examine this controversy from the perspective of the 1964 Wilderness Act, its judicial interpretation, the policies of the federal agencies, and formal agreements between federal and state agencies. Although some state stocking programs restore native fish populations, other programs may compromise some of the ecological and social values of wilderness areas. Further, although current federal regulations recognize state authority for fish stocking, judicial interpretation gives federal agencies the authority for direct involvement in decisions regarding fish stocking in wilderness. Where there are differences of opinion between state and federal managers, this judicial interpretation strongly points to the need for improved cooperation, communication, and coordination between state wildlife managers and federal wilderness managers to balance recreational fishing opportunities and other wildlife management activities with wilderness values.
机译：指定的荒野中的许多高海拔湖泊都由国家鱼类和萨姆机构放养本地和非本地鱼类，以提供休闲捕鱼的机会。在一些地区，这种做法引起了争议：州立野生动植物管理者支持历史性的荒野娱乐用途;联邦野外管理者断言放养损害了荒野的某些生态和社会价值;以及支持一个或另一个位置的不同公共团体。在这里，我们从1964年《荒野法》，其司法解释，联邦机构的政策以及联邦机构与州机构之间的正式协议的角度研究这一争议。尽管某些州的放养计划恢复了本地鱼类的数量，但其他计划可能会损害荒野地区的某些生态和社会价值。此外，尽管当前的联邦法规承认国家对鱼类种群的授权，但司法解释赋予了联邦机构直接参与有关野外鱼类种群决定的权力。在州和联邦管理人员之间意见分歧的情况下，这种司法解释强烈指出，州野生动植物管理人员与联邦荒野管理人员之间需要改善合作，沟通和协调，以平衡休闲捕鱼机会和其他具有野生价值的野生动植物管理活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号