...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Comparing construct definition in the Angoff and objective standard setting models: Playing in a house of cards without a full deck
【24h】

Comparing construct definition in the Angoff and objective standard setting models: Playing in a house of cards without a full deck

机译:比较Angoff和客观标准设置模型中的构造定义:在没有整张纸牌的情况下玩纸牌屋

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate and stable construct. The present study replicates and expands this work by presenting results from a 5-year investigation of both models, using two different approaches (equating and annual standard setting) within two testing settings (health care and education). The results support the original conclusion that although the OSS model demonstrates effective construct development, the Angoff approach appears random and lacking in clarity. Implications for creating meaningful and valid standards are discussed.
机译:对标准设置模型(尤其是Angoff模型和修改后的Angoff模型)的典型验证研究忽略了构造的发展,而构造的发展是与测量过程的所有概念化相关的关键方面。斯通比较了Angoff模型和客观标准设定(OSS)模型,发现Angoff未能定义合法且稳定的结构。本研究通过在两个测试设置(医疗保健和教育)中使用两种不同的方法(均等和年度标准设置)呈现两种模型的5年调查结果来复制和扩展这项工作。结果支持原始结论,即尽管OSS模型演示了有效的构造开发,但Angoff方法似乎是随机的并且缺乏清晰度。讨论了创建有意义和有效标准的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号