...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Management Journal. >To LEED or Not to LEED: Analysis of Cost Premiums Associated With Sustainable Facility Design
【24h】

To LEED or Not to LEED: Analysis of Cost Premiums Associated With Sustainable Facility Design

机译：对LEED或不对LEED：与可持续设施设计相关的成本溢价分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Many organizations have established policies authorizing a "green" cost premium to fund sustainable design. In order to determine whether or not this practice is supported, we collected construction, cost, and utility data on a sample of 160 LEED certified buildings. Using simple correlation and descriptive statistics to analyze the resulting database, we found operating costs in LEED certified buildings were $0.70 per square foot less than non-LEED buildings, energy costs were 31% lower, and cost premiums ranged from 2.5 to 9.4% with a mean of 4.1%. Correlation analysis suggests there are very few statistically significant correlations among the design variables.
机译：许多组织已经制定了授权“绿色”成本溢价来​​资助可持续设计的政策。为了确定是否支持此做法，我们从160项LEED认证建筑物的样本中收集了建筑，成本和公用事业数据。使用简单的相关性和描述性统计数据来分析结果数据库，我们发现LEED认证建筑的运营成本每平方英尺比非LEED建筑低0.70美元，能源成本降低31％，成本溢价介于2.5至9.4％之间，平均值为4.1％。相关分析表明，设计变量之间几乎没有统计上的显着相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号