...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Claims Journal >Decisions in 2007 Suggest that Maybe Public Nuisance Law Will Not Be a Monster to Devour the Entire Law of Tort
【24h】

Decisions in 2007 Suggest that Maybe Public Nuisance Law Will Not Be a Monster to Devour the Entire Law of Tort

机译:2007年的裁决表明,公害法可能不会成为吞噬整个侵权法的障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Numerous public entities have sought to use a theory of public nuisance to require lead pigment and lead paint manufacturers to pay for the costs of removing lead paint hazards.Lead paint litigation based on public nuisance has been filed in at least seven jurisdictions across the United States,with differing results.1 In several of these jurisdictions,courts rendered decisions during 2007 that evaluate whether these public entities have a basis for asserting public nuisance claims against lead pigment and lead paint manufacturers and distributors.
机译:许多公共实体都试图利用公共妨害理论来要求铅颜料和铅涂料制造商支付消除含铅油漆危害的费用。基于公众滋扰的铅涂料诉讼已在美国至少七个司法管辖区提起诉讼。 1在这些司法管辖区中,法院在2007年期间做出了决定,评估这些公共实体是否有依据对含铅颜料和含铅涂料制造商和分销商提出公共妨害主张。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号