...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental and ecological statistics >Biodiversity protection funding preference: A case study of hotspot geoinformatics and digital governance for the Map of Italian Nature in the presence of multiple indicators of ecological value, ecological sensitivity and anthropic pressure for the Oltrepò Pavese and Ligurian-Emilian Apennine study area in Italy
【24h】

Biodiversity protection funding preference: A case study of hotspot geoinformatics and digital governance for the Map of Italian Nature in the presence of multiple indicators of ecological value, ecological sensitivity and anthropic pressure for the Oltrepò Pavese and Ligurian-Emilian Apennine study area in Italy

机译：生物多样性保护资金偏好：在意大利OltrepòPavese和Ligurian-Emilian Apennine研究区存在生态价值，生态敏感性和人类压力等多个指标的情况下，针对意大利自然地图的热点地理信息学和数字治理进行的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The environmental decision-maker is aware of the increasing difficulties in finding sufficient financial resources for nature conservation. So he must focus his attention on ecological situations that more than the others merit considering and defending because of elevated value but also because of risk for their intrinsic characteristics and for human pressure acting on them. Usually an ecological scientist focuses his attention on the natural patches of the landscape, analyzing their peculiar ecological traits forgetting that, even if we want to protect some environmental critical situations, this can be done only moving to the administrative partition of the territory since the central and local environmental stakeholders have primary interest in providing funds to those involved in those critical situations. The present work shows a methodological approach, consisting of a set of statistical and geoinformational tools, considering both ecological and socio-demographical indicators. The goal is not simply to give some general guidelines for environmental policies to the involved stakeholders but focuses more on finding out which administrative local partitions in a study area are more worthy to receive urgently the priority funds for biodiversity protection to face critical environmental situations often due to a combination of intrinsic ecological parameters and external human pressure ones. Obtaining results that cover 5% of the Communes involved in the area seems to be a realistic result that a decision-maker can support and fund. Methodologically and geospatial data analytically, the investigation offers interesting challenges for surveillance geoinformatics of hotspot detection and prioritization, because of the presence of multiple hotspots and multiple sets of multiple indicators.
机译：环境决策者意识到为自然保护找到足够的财政资源越来越困难。因此，他必须将注意力集中在生态环境上，这比其他环境更值得考虑和捍卫，这不仅是因为其价值提高了，而且还因为它们的内在特征和承受人类压力的风险。通常，生态学家将注意力集中在自然景观上，分析其独特的生态特征，却忘记了，即使我们要保护某些环境紧急情况，也只能移至该地区的行政区域，因为中央当地的环境利益相关者最主要的兴趣是为那些处于紧急状态的人们提供资金。本工作展示了一种方法学方法，由一套统计和地理信息工具组成，同时考虑了生态和社会人口指标。目标不仅是向相关的利益相关者提供一些环境政策的一般指导方针，而且还着重于找出研究区域中哪些行政区域划分更值得紧急获得优先保护生物多样性的资金，以应对经常遇到的关键环境问题结合内在的生态参数和外部人类压力的参数。获得覆盖该地区5％公社的结果似乎是决策者可以支持和资助的现实结果。从方法论和地理空间数据的角度分析，由于存在多个热点和多组多个指标，调查为热点检测和优先级划分的监视地理信息学提出了有趣的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号