• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of forest research >Rational versus adaptive forest management planning: exploratory research on the strategic planning practices of Dutch forest management organizations
【24h】

Rational versus adaptive forest management planning: exploratory research on the strategic planning practices of Dutch forest management organizations

机译：理性与适应性森林经营规划：荷兰森林经营组织战略规划实践的探索性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The long-running debate between the rational and the adaptive school of strategic forest management planning has received considerable attention. There is, however, little empirical evidence of whether and how forest management organizations actuallyplan strategically. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the strategic planning practices of 22 Dutch forest management organizations faced with uncertain and unpredictable environments. Two characteristics on which the twoplanning approaches fundamentally differ form the basis of the description of the planning practices. The first characteristic relates to the way the external world is perceived; certainty is essential in the rational model, whereas uncertainty is central in the adaptive model. The second characteristic relates to the way the internal decision process is organized. Rational planning is much more static and stable, whereas adaptive planning processes are much more continuous, dynamic and natural. Interviews with the organizations studied point to a whole range of planning practices. Rational and adaptive planning are merely two ends of a continuum, and planning practices vary along this continuum. The rational-adaptive planning debate can therefore be considered oversimplified as it focuses only on the two extremes and does not incorporate the whole range of possible practices in between these extremes.
机译：战略森林管理规划的理性和适应性学派之间的长期争论受到了广泛关注。但是，关于森林经营组织是否以及如何进行战略规划的经验证据很少。本文的目的是通过描述22个荷兰森林管理组织面临不确定和不可预测的环境的战略规划实践来填补这一经验空缺。两种计划方法在根本上不同的两个特征构成了计划实践的描述基础。第一个特征与外界的感知方式有关。确定性在理性模型中至关重要，而不确定性在自适应模型中至关重要。第二个特征与内部决策过程的组织方式有关。理性计划更加静态和稳定，而自适应计划过程则更加连续，动态和自然。对所研究组织的访谈指出了整个规划实践。理性计划和适应性计划仅仅是一个连续体的两端，规划实践在这个连续体中会有所不同。因此，可以将合理化适应性规划辩论视为过于简单，因为它只关注两个极端，而没有将这两个极端之间的所有可能做法都包括在内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号