• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European journal of preventive cardiology >Are aerobic interval training and continuous training isocaloric in coronary artery disease patients?
【24h】

Are aerobic interval training and continuous training isocaloric in coronary artery disease patients?

机译：有氧间歇训练和连续训练是否对冠心病患者等量的？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background Aerobic interval training (IT) seems to be superior to continuous training (CT) in improving exercise capacity (peak oxygen uptake (VO2)) in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients in some, but not in all studies. Based on theoretical calculations, these comparative studies stated that the energy expenditure (EE) of both programmes is similar. To date, the caloricity of both programmes has never been objectively measured. Therefore, our aim was to objectively measure the EE of the IT and CT programmes described in the protocol of the SAINTEX-CAD study (based on Wisloff etal.; ITw and CTw), and the actually performed training intensities in the SAINTEX-CAD study by Conraads etal. (ITc and CTc).
机译：背景在某些（并非所有）研究中，有氧间歇训练（IT）在改善运动能力（峰值摄氧量（VO2））方面似乎优于连续训练（CT）。根据理论计算，这些比较研究表明，两个程序的能源支出（EE）相似。迄今为止，这两个程序的热量尚未得到客观衡量。因此，我们的目的是客观地测量SAINTEX-CAD研究协议（基于Wisloff等; ITw和CTw）中描述的IT和CT程序的EE，以及SAINTEX-CAD研究中实际执行的训练强度由Conraads等人撰写。 （ITc和CTc）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号