• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European psychiatry: the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists >Gender differences in the sensitivity to negative stimuli: Cross-modal affective priming study
【24h】

Gender differences in the sensitivity to negative stimuli: Cross-modal affective priming study

机译：对负面刺激的敏感性中的性别差异：跨模式情感启动研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: There is evidence showing that men and women differ with regard to the processing of emotional information. However, the mechanisms behind these differences are not fully understood. Method: The sample comprised of 275 (167 female) right-handed, healthy participants, recruited from the community. We employed a customized affective priming task, which consisted of three subtests, differing in the modality of the prime (face, written word, and sound). The targets were always written words of either positive or negative valence. The priming effect was measured as reaction time facilitation in conditions where both prime and target were emotional (of the same positive or negative valence) compared with conditions where the emotional targets were preceded by neutral primes. Results: The priming effect was observed across all three modalities, with an interaction of gender by valence: the priming effect in the emotionally negative condition in male participants was stronger compared with females. This was accounted for by the differential priming effect within the female group where priming was significantly smaller in the emotionally negative conditions compared with the positive conditions. The male participants revealed a comparable priming effect across both the emotionally negative and positive conditions. Conclusion: Reduced priming in negative conditions in women may reflect interference processes due to greater sensitivity to negative valence of stimuli. This in turn could underlie the gender-related differences in susceptibility to emotional disorders. ? 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS.
机译：背景：有证据表明，男人和女人在处理情感信息方面有所不同。但是，这些差异背后的机制尚不完全清楚。方法：从社区中招募的样本包括275名（167名女性）惯用右手的健康参与者。我们采用了定制的情感启动任务，该任务由三个子测试组成，它们的启动方式（面部，书面文字和声音）不同。目标始终是正价或负价的书面词。与在情绪目标之前带有中性灌注的情况相比，在灌注和目标都处于情感状态（正价或负价）的条件下，以启动反应时间作为促进反应时间的指标。结果：在所有三种方式中均观察到了启动作用，并且通过效价进行了性别交互作用：与女性相比，男性参与者在情绪负面条件下的启动作用更强。这是由于女性组内的差异性启动作用造成的，在这种情况下，与积极条件相比，在情绪负面条件下的启动作用明显较小。男性参与者揭示了在情绪消极和积极条件下可比的启动作用。结论：由于对负价刺激的敏感性更高，女性在负性条件下的启动次数减少可能反映了干扰过程。反过来，这可能是与性别相关的情绪障碍敏感性差异的基础。 ？ 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号