...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency medicine journal: EMJ >Evaluation of morning report in an emergency medicine department.
【24h】

Evaluation of morning report in an emergency medicine department.

机译：在急诊科评估晨报。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Morning report is considered as an important educational tool in different branches of medicine. The purpose of the present study was to examine the method of case selection, the leadership, the participant's satisfaction and the educational value of morning report held in our centre. METHOD: In September 2007, a formal feedback about the morning report was provided by questionnaire surveys. The data on the method of case selection, the leadership, the participant's satisfaction and the educational value of the sessions were collected from the residents, medical students and the academic staff in emergency medicine department. Each questionnaire also contained an open-ended question, asking for the responders' suggestions for improving these sessions. RESULTS: 73.2% of the responders were satisfied with the current model of the conference hall. The data showed that 46.3% of the participants believed these sessions are held for giving the medical team the required information and 65.9% for solving the patient's problems. The data showed that the participants had evaluated the presentation strategy to be good; however, the presentation pattern was reported to be traditional and based on differential diagnosis in 53.7% of the cases and modern problem oriented in only 39%. CONCLUSION: Most participants considered morning report sessions held in our hospital to be effective in the way it is; however, issues such as communication skill, emergency department management, critical thinking, ethics, professionalism and evidence-based medicine should also be added to the sessions.
机译：背景：晨报被认为是医学各个分支领域的重要教育工具。本研究的目的是研究案例选择的方法，领导力，参与者的满意度以及在我们中心举行的晨报的教育价值。方法：2007年9月，通过问卷调查提供了有关早间报告的正式反馈。从住院医师，医学生和急诊科的学术人员那里收集了有关病例选择方法，领导力，参与者满意度和会议教育价值的数据。每个问卷还包含一个开放式问题，征求受访者的建议以改善这些环节。结果：73.2％的响应者对会议厅的当前模型感到满意。数据显示，有46.3％的参与者认为举行这些会议是为了向医疗团队提供所需的信息，而65.9％的参与者认为是为了解决患者的问题。数据表明，参与者对演讲策略的评价很好。然而，据报道表现形式是传统的，基于鉴别诊断的病例占53.7％，而针对现代问题的病例只有39％。结论：大多数参与者认为在我们医院举行的早晨报告会是有效的。然而，诸如沟通技巧，急诊科管理，批判性思维，道德，专业精神和循证医学等问题也应加入会议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号