...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>European radiology >Letter to the editor re: 'diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis'-unfair study selection in meta-analysis.
【24h】

Letter to the editor re: 'diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis'-unfair study selection in meta-analysis.

机译：给编辑的回信：“应力心肌灌注显像对冠心病的诊断性能：系统评价和荟萃分析”-荟萃分析中的不公平研究选择。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

I was disappointed to realise that in the recent meta-analysis published online ahead of print in your journal, entitled "Diagnostic performance of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by de Jong et al. [1], the single numerically most relevant prospective diagnostic study in the contrast stress-echo field, which I co-authored [2], comprising 400 patients and published in 2010 (in time for being included), was not cited and its data not included in the meta-analysis; this is a relevant mistake, first made by the authors in the data selection process and then by the reviewers in accepting such severely incomplete data: inevitably this makes the meta-analysis results and conclusions deeply flawed.
机译：令我失望的是，de Jong等人在题为“应激性心肌灌注成像对冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能：系统评价和荟萃分析”的期刊上在线出版的近期荟萃分析中感到失望。 [1]是我与他人合着的[2]，包含400位患者并于2010年发表（及时被收录），它是对比压力回声领域中数值上最相关的一项前瞻性诊断研究，其数据没有被引用。不包括在荟萃分析中;这是一个相关的错误，首先是作者在数据选择过程中犯下的错误，然后是审稿人在接受如此严重的不完整数据时犯下的：这不可避免地使荟萃分析的结果和结论存在严重缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号