• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Genewatch : >Tell Me a Story: Genomics vs. Indigenous Origin Narratives-Indigenous critics worry-for good reason -that an insidious sort of racism persists in some genomic research, especially when its sights are set on indigenous peoples and their origins
【24h】

Tell Me a Story: Genomics vs. Indigenous Origin Narratives-Indigenous critics worry-for good reason -that an insidious sort of racism persists in some genomic research, especially when its sights are set on indigenous peoples and their origins

机译：告诉我一个故事：基因组学与土著起源的叙事-土著评论家担心-有充分的理由-在某些基因组学研究中仍然存在着一种隐匿的种族主义，尤其是当它的目光投向了土著人民及其起源时

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On April 13, 2005 the Indigenous Peoples' Council on Biocolonialism issued a press release1 opposing the Genographic Project, which aimed to sample 100,000 indigenous and other traditional peoples to "trace the migratory history of the human species" and "map how the Earth was populated."2 IPCB critiques Genographic, and the Human Genome Diversity Project before it, as the contemporary continuation of colonial, extractive research. The analysis is also a fundamental historical examination of Western science. IPCB foregrounds the intellectual and institutional authority that science, a powerful tool of colonizing states, has to appropriate indigenous bodies-both dead and living-material cultural artifacts, and indigenous cultural narratives in the service of academic knowledge production.
机译：2005年4月13日，土著人民生物殖民主义委员会发布了一份反对“地理学计划”的新闻稿1，该计划旨在对100,000名土著和其他传统人民进行抽样调查，以“追踪人类的迁徙历史”并“绘制地球人口分布图“ 2 IPCB批判了Genographic及其之前的人类基因组多样性计划，作为当代殖民，提取研究的延续。分析也是对西方科学的基本历史考察。 IPCB展现了知识和机构权威，科学是殖民国家的有力工具，必须具有适当的土著机构，包括死者和生活材料文化制品以及土著文化叙事，以服务于学术知识的生产。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号