• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz >(Gold standards for scientific proof of efficacy and effectiveness as prerequisites for the dissemination of intervention programs in the field of early intervention. Randomized controlled trials).
【24h】

(Gold standards for scientific proof of efficacy and effectiveness as prerequisites for the dissemination of intervention programs in the field of early intervention. Randomized controlled trials).

机译：（科学和有效的证据证明金标准是在早期干预领域传播干预计划的先决条件。随机对照试验）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The necessity of early intervention is recognized both nationally and internationally. This however goes hand in hand with the legitimate request for proving the efficacy and effectiveness of prevention and intervention programs. There are many international studies on this. Some of these exhibit a number of problems, which often restricts the validity of the studies' results. A scientific evaluation of programs in Germany, on the other hand, is often missing entirely or the studies and evaluations are currently in progress. The article at hand using the example of the randomized controlled trial (RCT) gives an overview of which gold standards of evaluation are desirable or should be scientifically demanded to prove efficacy and effectiveness of prevention/intervention in the field of early intervention. Standards for efficacy refer to 1) specification of the program's efficacy, 2) program documentation, 3) evaluating the quality of how the program was carried out, 4) recording and evaluating expected changes, as well as 5) conclusions concerning the causality of results and generalizations. Standards for efficiency refer to 1) description of the intervention, 2) evaluation in real-life contexts and 3) cost-benefit analysis. Based on a presentation of these standards, recommendations are made for the dissemination of prevention and intervention programs.
机译：国家和国际都承认尽早干预的必要性。但是，这与证明预防和干预计划的有效性和有效性的合法要求是同时进行的。关于这一点有很多国际研究。其中一些表现出许多问题，这常常限制了研究结果的有效性。另一方面，对德国计划的科学评估常常被完全遗漏，或者研究和评估目前正在进行中。本文以随机对照试验（RCT）为例，概述了哪些黄金评价标准是可取的，或者应该科学地要求其在早期干预领域证明预防/干预的有效性和有效性。效力标准指的是1）程序效力的规范，2）程序文档，3）评估程序执行方式的质量，4）记录和评估预期的更改以及5）关于结果因果关系的结论和概括。效率标准指的是1）干预措施的描述，2）在现实生活中的评估以及3）成本效益分析。根据这些标准的介绍，提出了传播预防和干预计划的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号