首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >WHY SHOULDN'T CORPORATIONS BE LIABLE UNDER THE ATS?
【24h】

WHY SHOULDN'T CORPORATIONS BE LIABLE UNDER THE ATS?

机译:为什么公司在ATS下不承担责任?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

My question has a one-word answer: Congress. The explanation, however, takes a few pages. As nearly every reader of this Journal knows, the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) is a one-sentence law enacted by Congress in 1789 that reads: "[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States." Enacted as part of the Judiciary Act of 1789, which was passed soon after ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the ATS was intended to show European powers that the new nation would not tolerate violations of its treaties or the "law of nations," especially when foreign ambassadors or foreign ship owners were assaulted by U.S. citizens. The purpose was to avert unnecessary tensions between the United States and Europe: America would not harbor scofflaws. The immediate concerns were attacks against foreign ambassadors; piracy on the high seas and safe conduct for foreign diplomats were thrown in for good measure.
机译:我的问题只有一个字:国会。但是,说明需要几页。几乎每个《华尔街日报》的读者都知道,《外国人侵权法》(ATS)是国会于1789年颁布的一句话法,其中规定:“地区法院对外国人针对任何外国人的任何民事诉讼具有原始管辖权仅违反国际法或美国条约而实施的侵权行为。”作为1789年《司法法》的一部分颁布的《 ATS》旨在向欧洲大国表明,新国家将不容忍违反其条约或“国际法”的行为,特别是在外国大使或外国船东遭到美国公民的袭击。目的是避免美国与欧洲之间不必要的紧张局势:美国不会怀有偷偷摸摸的习惯。当务之急是对外国大使的袭击;公海海盗行为和外国外交人员的安全行径受到了良好的惩罚。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号