...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Georgetown Journal of International Law >NOT EVERYTHING IS AS EASY AS A FRENCH PRESS: THE DANGEROUS REASONING OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ON PROOF OF FOREIGN LAW AND A POSSIBLE SOLUTION
【24h】

NOT EVERYTHING IS AS EASY AS A FRENCH PRESS: THE DANGEROUS REASONING OF THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT ON PROOF OF FOREIGN LAW AND A POSSIBLE SOLUTION

机译：并非所有的事情都像法国媒体那样容易：第七条关于外国法律证明和可能解决方案的危险理由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Given current rules concerning cases with a conflict of laws, U.S. judges are often required to interpret the laws of a foreign nation to resolve the controversy before them. In federal courts, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 governs the procedure for proof of foreign law in federal courts; the rule is permissive, allowing courts to determine the law by hearing experts or doing its own research. A recent Seventh Circuit case, Bodum USA, Inc. v. La Cafetiere, Inc., dangerously argues that judges should restrict themselves to judicial research; instead, the goal should be to expand the available methods. Reviewing the practices of other domestic legal systems reveals that a recent New South Wales Supreme Court reciprocal agreement with the Court of Appeals of New York can serve as the model for an additional method of proof of foreign law. The Hague Conventions on Evidence and Service of Process can serve as models for a multilateral process, but there are difficulties with implementing such a treaty in the United States.
机译：根据有关法律冲突案件的现行规则，通常要求美国法官解释外国的法律，以解决面前的争议。在联邦法院中，《联邦民事诉讼规则》第44.1条规定了联邦法院中证明外国法律的程序;该规则是允许的，允许法院通过听取专家意见或进行自己的研究来确定法律。 Bodum USA，Inc.诉La Cafetiere，Inc.一案在最近的第七巡回法院案中危险地提出，法官应将自己局限于司法研究;相反，目标应该是扩展可用方法。回顾其他国内法律制度的实践，可以发现，新南威尔士州最高法院与纽约上诉法院的互惠协议可以作为其他证明外国法律方法的典范。 《海牙证据和送达服务公约》可以作为多边程序的典范，但在美国执行该条约存在困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号