首页> 外文期刊>Far Eastern Economic Review >After Doha: Protectionism Creep
【24h】

After Doha: Protectionism Creep

机译:多哈之后:贸易保护主义蔓延

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

THE WORLD TRADE Organization's Doha Round has collapsed, perhaps terminally. This predictable failure reflects a much deeper malaise. Policies governing international trade and investment have become hopelessly outdated. They are stuck in anach-ronistic 20th-century mindsets, institutions and regulations, increasingly disconnected from today's business realities, WTO malfunction is symptomatic, but so is the profusion of commercially nonsensical preferential trade agreements (PTAS), agreements that (on the surface) offer free trade to members but (implicitly) protection against non-members. Doha Round negotiations have been bogged down in obscure discussions on "special and differential treatment," "aid for trade," "special products" and "sensitive products" in agriculture, not to mention mind-numbingly complicated coefficients for cutting tariffs and subsidies-all a world away from commercial realities outside Geneva, PTAS, meanwhile, are creating a veritable mess of bureaucratic regulations that threaten to compli-cate rather than simplify international commerce.
机译:世界贸易组织的多哈回合谈判可能已经崩溃,甚至即将结束。这种可预见的失败反映出更加严重的不适。规范国际贸易和投资的政策已经过时了。它们陷入了20世纪的狂热思维,制度和法规中,与当今的商业现实越来越脱节,WTO失灵是有症状的,但是大量商业上无意义的特惠贸易协议(PTAS)以及(表面上)的协议也是如此向成员提供自由贸易,但(隐式)保护非成员。多哈回合谈判陷入停滞不前的讨论中,涉及农业中的“特殊和差别待遇”,“贸易援助”,“特殊产品”和“敏感产品”,更不用说令人费解的削减关税和补贴的系数了,同时,在远离日内瓦以外的商业现实的世界范围内,PTAS正在制造一堆名副其实的官僚主义法规,威胁要简化而不是简化国际贸易。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号