...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Forest Policy and Economics >Conflict resolution through collaboration: preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies. (Special Issue: Forest land use and conflict management: Global issues and lessons learned.)
【24h】

Conflict resolution through collaboration: preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies. (Special Issue: Forest land use and conflict management: Global issues and lessons learned.)

机译：通过合作解决冲突：森林和自然保护争议的前提和局限。 （特刊：林地使用和冲突管理：全球问题和经验教训。）

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Increasing competition over the world's forest resources will likely aggravate conflict, though conflict should not be seen as bad per se. As the challenge is to develop institutions and practices capable of handling conflict constructively, various collaborative approaches involving disputing actors are evolving worldwide. In Sweden, most such approaches pertain to protected areas and few involve commercial forestry. The reasons for the rise of different approaches to collaboration in protected areas and commercially managed forest lands are explored through a comparison of two conflicts embedded in different management regimes. The study suggests that actor interdependence is critical to how collaboration evolves. Interdependence is in turn affected by the institutions, discourses, and economic context in which the process is embedded. When contextual factors are unfavourable, power relations too unequal, and interdependencies between dominant and subordinated actors weak, the prospects for collaboration are slim. In an enabling context, in contrast, mobilization may alter power relations and interdependencies, making collaboration possible. This study suggests that the low occurrence of collaborative land use planning in many parts of Sweden may be related to the presence of strong economic land use interests, un-successful mobilization of weaker parties, and absence of enabling institutional and discursive factors.
机译：尽管不应该将冲突本身视为坏事，但对世界森林资源的日益激烈的竞争可能会加剧冲突。由于挑战是发展能够建设性地处理冲突的机构和实践，因此涉及争议参与者的各种协作方法正在全球范围内发展。在瑞典，大多数此类方法涉及保护区，很少涉及商业林业。通过比较不同管理制度中存在的两种冲突，探讨了在保护区和商业管理的林地中采用不同的合作方式的原因。该研究表明，演员之间的相互依赖关系对于协作的发展至关重要。相互依存继而受到过程嵌入其中的制度，话语和经济背景的影响。当情境因素不利，权力关系过于不平等，主导和从属行为者之间的相互依存性弱时，合作的前景就很渺茫。相反，在有利的背景下，动员可能会改变权力关系和相互依存关系，从而使合作成为可能。这项研究表明，在瑞典许多地区，土地合作规划的发生率较低，可能与强大的经济土地使用利益存在，动员较弱的政党不成功以及缺乏有利的体制和话语因素有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号