...

首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology nursing: the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates >CASE REPORT OF WORKING WITH AN INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD TO APPROVE A STUDY ON A PARTICULARLY SENSITIVE TOPIC IN A PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE POPULATION: INVESTIGATOR NEGOTIATION AND COMPROMISE MAY BE THE BEST STRATEGY

【24h】

CASE REPORT OF WORKING WITH AN INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD TO APPROVE A STUDY ON A PARTICULARLY SENSITIVE TOPIC IN A PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE POPULATION: INVESTIGATOR NEGOTIATION AND COMPROMISE MAY BE THE BEST STRATEGY

机译：与机构审查委员会合作批准关于对特别易受伤害的人群的特定敏感主题进行研究的案例报告：进行谈判和妥协可能是最好的策略

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Gastroenterology nursing: the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates》 |2015年第1期|共2页
作者
Cappell Mitchell S.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类护理学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献

1. CASE REPORT OF WORKING WITH AN INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD TO APPROVE A STUDY ON A PARTICULARLY SENSITIVE TOPIC IN A PARTICULARLY VULNERABLE POPULATION: INVESTIGATOR NEGOTIATION AND COMPROMISE MAY BE THE BEST STRATEGY [J] . Cappell Mitchell S. Gastroenterology nursing: the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates . 2015,第1期

机译：与机构审查委员会合作批准关于对特别易受伤害的人群的特定敏感主题进行研究的案例报告：进行谈判和妥协可能是最好的策略
2. How do 66 European institutional review boards approve one protocol for an international prospective observational study on traumatic brain injury? Experiences from the CENTER-TBI study [J] . Marjolein Timmers, Jeroen T. J. M. van Dijck, Roel P. J. van Wijk, BMC Medical Ethics . 2020,第1期

机译：66欧洲机构审查委员会如何批准一个关于创伤性脑损伤的国际潜在观察研究的一份议定书？中心TBI研究的经验
3. Are central institutional review boards the solution? The national heart, lung, and blood institute working Group's report on optimizing the IRB process [J] . MascetteA.M., BernardG.R., DimicheleD., Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges . 2012,第12期

机译：中央机构审查委员会是解决方案吗？美国国家心肺血液研究所工作组关于优化IRB流程的报告
4. Vulnerability Assessment, Remediation, and Automated Reporting: Case Studies of Higher Education Institutions [C] . Christopher R. Harrell, Mark Patton, Hsinchun Chen, IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics . 2018

机译：漏洞评估，修复和自动报告：高校案例研究
5. Development of a domain analysis model for electronic institutional review board systems: A feasibility study. [D] . He, Shan. 2013

机译：为电子机构审查委员会系统开发域分析模型：一项可行性研究。
6. Investigators’ Successful Strategies for Working with Institutional Review Boards [O] . Juliana C. Cartwright, Susan E. Hickman, Christine A. Nelson, -1

机译：调查员与机构审查委员会合作的成功策略
7. Investigators’ Successful Strategies for Working with Institutional Review Boards [O] . Cartwright Juliana C., Hickman Susan E., Nelson Christine A., 2013

机译：调查员与机构审查委员会合作的成功策略

获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

客服微信
服务号