首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics >Comparisons of different types of stabilization programmes for agricultural incomes in Quebec.
【24h】

Comparisons of different types of stabilization programmes for agricultural incomes in Quebec.

机译:魁北克不同类型的农业收入稳定计划的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Static and dynamic target-MOTAD programming models were used to analyse the impacts of government insurance programmes upon optimal resource allocation and gross margins of a representative Quebec farm. Three alternative programmes are evaluated: ASRA/ASREC (price-insurance plus yield-insurance), RARB (price and yield insurance combined as revenue insurance) and CSRN (a farmer-managed saving programme to which the government contributes). The results revealed that expected incomes are higher for RARB than for ASRA/ASREC at low levels of risk, but converge at higher levels of risk. Resource allocation and farm size differed somewhat. Two ratios were calculated to compare the social effectiveness of the two intervention programmes : net government expenses to gross margins, and net government expenses to net farm income. The results showed that an RARB programme is superior to separate ASRA and ASREC programmes, even if government transfers per unit assured are held constant. Under the CSRN scenario, farmers optimally reduce their farm size to a half or a quarter of that under the ASRA/ASREC or RARB scenarios while using strategic deposits and withdrawals from the CSRN.
机译:静态和动态目标-MOTAD编程模型用于分析政府保险计划对魁北克代表性农场的最佳资源分配和毛利率的影响。对三个备选方案进行了评估:ASRA / ASREC(价格保险加收益保险),RARB(价格和收益保险合并为收益保险)和CSRN(政府为农民管理的储蓄计划)。结果表明,在低风险水平下,RARB的预期收入要高于ASRA / ASREC,但在较高风险水平下会趋于一致。资源分配和服务器场大小有所不同。计算了两个比率,以比较这两个干预计划的社会有效性:政府净支出与毛利率之间的关系,以及政府净支出与农场净收入之间的比率。结果表明,即使将每单位保证金的政府转移保持不变,RARB计划也优于单独的ASRA和ASREC计划。在CSRN方案下,农民使用ASRN / ASREC或RARB方案下的农场规模最佳减少到一半或四分之一,同时使用CSRN的战略性存款和取款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号