...
首页> 外文期刊>Management of Environmental Quality >A field study on cost-effectiveness of five erosion control measures
【24h】

A field study on cost-effectiveness of five erosion control measures

机译:五个侵蚀控制措施的成本效益实地研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this study is to quantitatively evaluate five erosion control measures at a residential development area in Louisiana, USA in order to provide Best Management Practices (BMPs) that have been tested in the field with demonstrated cost-effectiveness. Design/methodology/approach - A total of six testing sites at a nine-degree slope were used in parallel to study five erosion control measures with one being the control site (no protection). Soil erosion rate was quantified using the erosion bridge method. Soil underlying the study area was analyzed for surface runoff potential. Precipitation was monitored using a Sigma rain gauge. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student Newman-Keuls Post-Hoc ANOVA analysis were conducted to evaluate statistical significance of erosion control effectiveness. Ratio of soil erosion rate reduction to cost of each control measure is also analyzed. Findings - All erosion control measures studied were very effective in reducing soil erosion for soils with high runoff potential, ranging from 75 percent to about 100 percent reduction in soil erosion rate. The most effective soil erosion protection was observed by Geojute fabric and Curlex blanket with greater than 90 percent reduction in soil erosion rate. However, after factoring-in cost, straw bedding was observed to be five times as cost-effective as Geojute fabric and Curlex blanket. The most cost-effective measure is temporary seeding using perennial rye grass. For each dollar spent, about 12 tons of soil per acre per year will be prevented from eroding. Originality/value - The study evaluated erosion control measures in the field with quantitative cost-effectiveness analyzed. Besides enforcement, providing practical and cost-effectiveness control measures that have been tested in the field is critical for actual implementation of erosion control measures.
机译:目的-这项研究的目的是对美国路易斯安那州一个住宅开发区的五种侵蚀控制措施进行定量评估,以提供经现场测试证明具有成本效益的最佳管理实践(BMP)。设计/方法/方法-总共使用六个倾斜度为9度的测试地点来研究五项侵蚀控制措施,其中一项为控制地点(无保护)。土壤侵蚀率用侵蚀桥方法定量。分析研究区域下方的土壤的地表径流潜力。使用Sigma雨量计监测降水。进行方差分析(ANOVA)和学生Newman-Keuls事后ANOVA分析,以评估侵蚀控制效果的统计意义。还分析了土壤侵蚀速率降低与每种控制措施成本的比率。调查结果-研究的所有侵蚀控制措施对于减少径流高潜力土壤的土壤侵蚀非常有效,其土壤侵蚀率降低了75%至100%。使用Geojute织物和Curlex毯子可观察到最有效的土壤侵蚀防护,土壤侵蚀速率降低了90%以上。但是,考虑到成本因素,稻草床上用品的成本效益是Geojute织物和Curlex毯子的五倍。最具成本效益的措施是使用多年生黑麦草进行临时播种。每花费一美元,每年就可以防止每英亩约12吨土壤侵蚀。原创性/价值-该研究评估了该领域的侵蚀控制措施,并分析了定量成本效益。除了强制执行之外,提供已在现场进行测试的实用且具有成本效益的控制措施对于实际实施侵蚀控制措施至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号