• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Forum der Psychoanalyse: Zeitschrift fuer klinische theorie und praxis >Hermeneutik oder Szientismus? Unterwegs zu einer triadischen Epistemologie
【24h】

Hermeneutik oder Szientismus? Unterwegs zu einer triadischen Epistemologie

机译：诠释学还是科学主义？在走向三元认识论的路上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Hermeneutics (meaning, understanding) and scientism (causality, explanation) formed and still form opposites that make it difficult to adequately conceptualize self-determination and positioning of psychoanalysis in the theory of sciences. The first proposal is to view these opposites not as an either-or principle but more as the principle of complementarity as proposed in the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum physics. Then, the communicative turn of hermeneutics as thoroughly worked through by Habermas can be combined with results of empirical research from infant research and primatology so that a bridge between the two camps comes into sight. This bridge is stable if besides "meaning" and "causality" a third pole is established:sociality. Thus, a step forward to a triadic epistemology can be taken which is prepared here. Research on the microstructure of social interactions in psychoanalysis confirms the possibilities of including a social dimension which is extremely important but widely ignored in the theory of scientific debates between hermeneutics and science.
机译：解释学（含义，理解）和科学主义（因果关系，解释）形成并且仍然形成对立面，这使得很难在科学理论中充分地概念化自我决定和精神分析的定位。第一个建议是将这些相反的观点视为“对等原则”，而不是“互补原则”，这在哥本哈根量子物理学的解释中提出。然后，哈贝马斯彻底解释的诠释学的交际转向可以与婴儿研究和灵长类动物学的经验研究结果相结合，从而使两大阵营之间架起一座桥梁。如果除了“意义”和“因果关系”之外，还建立了第三极：社会性，那么这个桥梁是稳定的。因此，可以迈向三元认识论的一步，在此做好准备。在心理分析中对社会互动的微观结构的研究证实了包括诠释学和科学之间的科学辩论理论中极为重要但被广泛忽略的社会维度的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号