• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Open-book tests: Search behaviour, time used and test scores
【24h】

Open-book tests: Search behaviour, time used and test scores

机译：开卷考试：搜索行为，使用时间和考试成绩

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Background: Because of the increasing medical knowledge and the focus of medical education on acquiring competencies, the use of open-book tests seems inevitable. Dealing with a large body of information, indicating which kind of information is needed to solve a problem, and finding and understanding that knowledge at the right moment are behaviours that cannot be assessed during closed-book tests. Aims: To examine whether there is a relationship between students' search behaviour-using references or not when answering a question-during open-book tests and their test scores. Method: Second- (N = 491) and third-year medical students (N = 325) participated in this study. Search behaviour was operationalized as the number of questions for which students consulted their references. Furthermore, we collected data on the time students spent on answering all open-book questions and their test scores. To determine the relations, we calculated Spearman's and Pearson's correlations. Results: Second- and third-year students consulted their references for 87% and 73% of the questions and spent 5.0 and 4.3 min on answering an open-book question, respectively. We did not find significant correlations between search behaviour and test scores. Conclusion: Both 'well' and 'poorer performing' students often consulted their references. Spending almost 5 min per open-book question in multiple choice format seems to be too much. More research is needed to establish optimal open-book test time and to explore how 'well performing' students use their references during open-book tests.
机译：背景：由于医学知识的增长和医学教育对获得能力的关注，使用开放式考试似乎是不可避免的。处理大量信息，指示解决问题所需的信息种类，并在适当的时机发现并理解知识是在闭卷测试中无法评估的行为。目的：检查在开卷考试中回答问题时，学生使用搜索方式的参考文献与他们的考试成绩之间是否存在关联。方法：第二名（N = 491）和三年级医学生（N = 325）参加了这项研究。搜索行为已作为学生参考其参考文献的问题数量而投入使用。此外，我们收集了有关学生在回答所有公开问题和测试分数上所花费时间的数据。为了确定关系，我们计算了Spearman和Pearson的相关性。结果：二年级和三年级学生参考了他们的参考文献，分别回答了87％和73％的问题，并分别花了5.0和4.3分钟回答了一个开卷问题。我们没有发现搜索行为与考试成绩之间存在显着相关性。结论：“表现良好”和“表现较差”的学生都经常参考他们的参考书。每个单选题以选择题形式花费近5分钟的时间似乎太多了。为了确定最佳的开卷考试时间，并探索“表现良好”的学生在开卷考试中如何使用参考资料，还需要进行更多的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号