• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Mental health and social inclusion >'Is work good for you?' Does paid employment produce positive social capital returns for people with severe and enduring mental health conditions?
【24h】

'Is work good for you?' Does paid employment produce positive social capital returns for people with severe and enduring mental health conditions?

机译：“对你有好处吗？”带薪工作是否会为患有严重和持久精神疾病的人们带来积极的社会资本回报？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Purpose - This paper seeks to examine whether paid employment produces positive social capital returns for people with severe and enduring mental health needs. Design/methodology/approach - A sample of 96 users of mental health services in Sussex, who had been supported to return to work, completed a questionnaire rating their level of agreement with statements about their quality of life both before and after they started working. In addition, three supplementary individual case studies were made. Findings - Analysis showed significant increases in reported quality of life following employment. The post-employment positivity of responses was found across most areas of well-being. Significant but varying gains were found in the majority of individuals who reported improvement in the following areas; social life; independence; resilience; confidence and self-esteem; optimism; satisfaction; general happiness and ability to manage mental health. A third of individuals reported improvements in personal relationships and physical health. Qualitative data indicated that increased confidence was perceived by participants as the most important factor. Increased benefits were also found to be associated with individuals who had worked for a longer period, worked longer hours and were supported on a contract with high fidelity to the IPS model. Research limitations/implications - The paper relies on a self-report method requiring respondents to reflect on how they felt pre and post gaining employment. This follows a rather subjective methodology. There were a number of individuals who had only worked for one month or less in the past year. These are unlikely to have experienced social capital returns or in fact any real impact at all as a result of working and likely distorted the results to some extent. Originality/value - There have been limited research studies that have examined the additional social capital returns for people with enduring mental ill health who return to work.
机译：目的-本文旨在研究有偿就业是否能为有严重和持久精神健康需求的人们带来积极的社会资本回报。设计/方法/方法-在苏塞克斯的96名心理健康服务使用者中，有一部分得到支持返回工作，该人完成了一份调查问卷，对他们的同意程度进行了评估，并就他们开始工作前后的生活质量进行了陈述。此外，还进行了三个补充个案研究。调查结果-分析显示，就业后生活质量显着提高。在大多数幸福感领域中，人们都发现就业后的积极性。在以下几个方面报告有所改善的大多数人中，发现了显着但不同的收获;社会生活;独立;弹性;自信和自尊;乐观;满意;总体幸福感和管理心理健康的能力。三分之一的人报告说在人际关系和身体健康方面有所改善。定性数据表明，参与者认为增加的信心是最重要的因素。人们还发现，与工作时间更长，工作时间更长，并获得了IPS模式的高保真度合同支持的个人相关的福利增加。研究的局限性/含意-本文依靠一种自我报告的方法，要求受访者反思自己在就业前后的感受。这遵循了相当主观的方法。在过去的一年中，有很多人只工作了一个月或更短的时间。由于工作，这些人不太可能获得社会资本回报或实际上没有任何实际影响，并可能在某种程度上扭曲结果。原创性/价值-很少有研究调查过重返工作岗位的精神疾病患者的社会资本回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号