...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Mining Engineering >Comparing EIA and ESHIA for evaluating mining projects
【24h】

Comparing EIA and ESHIA for evaluating mining projects

机译：比较EIA和ESHIA以评估采矿项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The environmental impact assessment (EIA) is the accepted method for evaluating proposed mining and other industrial projects to obtain regulatory approval and to help companies plan for responsible development. Another increasingly common evaluation system for proposed projects is the environmental, social and health impact assessment (ESHIA). An ESHIA differs from an EIA for its generally more comprehensive and inclusive approach to evaluating potential impacts, such as on public health, and other features such as an ecosystem services approach to assessing biophysical and community impacts. An ESHIA may also be required by certain lenders for financing major projects. In this paper, EIA standards for the province of Alberta, Canada are discussed and compared to ESHIA. It concludes with several recommendations for consideration.
机译：环境影响评估（EIA）是评估提议的采矿和其他工业项目以获得监管批准并帮助公司计划负责任开发的公认方法。拟议项目的另一个日益普遍的评估系统是环境，社会和健康影响评估（ESHIA）。 ESHIA与EIA的不同之处在于，它通常用于评估潜在影响（例如对公共卫生的影响）的方式更加全面和包容，并且具有其他功能，例如用于评估生物物理和社区影响的生态系统服务方法。某些贷方可能还需要ESHIA来为重大项目融资。本文讨论了加拿大艾伯塔省的EIA标准，并将其与ESHIA进行了比较。最后总结了一些建议供您参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号