首页> 外文期刊>Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics >Migrating personality theories Part 2: towards a theory of the balanced personality?
【24h】

Migrating personality theories Part 2: towards a theory of the balanced personality?

机译:迁移人格理论第2部分:走向平衡人格理论?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - Some personality schemas are seen to compete with others, but are they really complementary? The purpose of this paper is to show that two trait approaches, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and Mindscape theory, which are normally considered to be competitive, shall be migrated into a more complex modeling space using knowledge cybernetics, when they are shown to have a complementary potential. Design/methodology/approach - The paper uses the meta-framework of knowledge cybernetics (KC) part of the relevantial universe identified by Maruyama, to migrate different theoretical approaches and relate them. A consequence is the possible development of a more sophisticated trait theory that is capable of providing more complex information about personality. Findings - The findings indicate that current type theories are not necessarily stand-alone, but may be seen as complementary within a broader conceptual framework. Research limitations/implications - This paper is limited to the investigation of MBTI. However, it offers a generic approach that can be applied to other solitary theories like MBTI. Practical implications - The paper leads to the possibility of improved explanatory power for a type theory than is currently possible. Originality/value - Very little comparative work has been done relating representations of MBTI and Mindscape theory. This also appears to be the first serious extensive direct comparison between any form of MBTI and Mindscapes. KC uses Habermas's three world theory and shows that it is possible to consider MBTI and Mindscape theory as conceptually distinct and complementary, and together contributing to a new way of exploring the field of personality theory.
机译:目的-某些人格模式被认为可以与其他人竞争,但它们真的互补吗?本文的目的是表明,通常被认为具有竞争力的两种特质方法,即迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)和Mindscape理论,应在被证明为知识控制论的情况下迁移到更复杂的建模空间中。具有互补的潜力。设计/方法论/方法-本文使用丸山所确定的相关宇宙的知识控制论(KC)部分的元框架,来迁移不同的理论方法并将其联系起来。结果是可能发展出更复杂的特质理论,该理论能够提供有关人格的更复杂的信息。调查结果-调查结果表明,当前的类型理论不一定是独立的,而是可以视为在更广泛的概念框架内的补充。研究的局限性/意义-本文仅限于MBTI的研究。但是,它提供了一种通用方法,可以应用于其他单独的理论,例如MBTI。实际的意义-本文导致类型理论的解释能力比目前可能的更高。原创性/价值-关于MBTI和Mindscape理论的表示,很少进行比较工作。这似乎也是任何形式的MBTI与Mindscapes之间的首次严肃,广泛的直接比较。 KC使用哈贝马斯的三世界理论,表明可以将MBTI和Mindscape理论视为概念上独特且互补的,并共同为探索人格理论领域提供了新途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号