首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews. Urology >Prostate cancer: Poor quality of published evidence for superiority of RALP
【24h】

Prostate cancer: Poor quality of published evidence for superiority of RALP

机译:前列腺癌:RALP优越性的公开证据质量差

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is widely used as a treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer in the US, and is being increasingly performed worldwide. The widespread adoption of this approach is in part based on reported superior results compared with open or conventional laparoscopic surgery, in terms of reduced complication rates, and improved oncological and functional outcomes. However, a systematic review by Diana Kang and colleagues suggests that this transition is based on weak evidence, which mainly comprises low-quality observational studies.
机译:机器人辅助的腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)在美国被广泛用作临床局限性前列腺癌的治疗方法,并且在世界范围内越来越多地进行。该方法的广泛采用部分是基于与开放或常规腹腔镜手术相比报道的优越结果,即降低了并发症的发生率,并改善了肿瘤学和功能方面的结果。但是,戴安娜·康(Diana Kang)及其同事的系统评价表明,这种转变是基于薄弱的证据,主要包括低质量的观察研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号