首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews. Urology >Pathology: Clinical benefit of scrotal specimen analysis questioned
【24h】

Pathology: Clinical benefit of scrotal specimen analysis questioned

机译:病理:阴囊标本分析的临床益处受到质疑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An investigation into the rate of malignancy detected in hydrocele and spermatocele specimens suggests that routine pathological analysis of these surgical samples is not clinically beneficial, and incurs considerable cost to the patient or health-care system. Viral Shah and colleagues at the University of Iowa reviewed the medical records of 264 patients who underwent surgery for hydrocele or spermatocele at their institution between January 2000 and August 2013. They found that a large proportion of samples were sent for pathological analysis: 51% and 90% of all hydrocelectomy and spermatocelectomy specimens, respectively.
机译:对在鞘膜积液和精囊膨出标本中检出的恶性肿瘤的调查表明,对这些手术标本进行常规病理分析在临床上无益,并给患者或医疗系统带来了可观的成本。爱荷华大学的Viral Shah及其同事回顾了2000年1月至2013年8月在其机构接受过鞘膜积液或精子囊肿手术的264例患者的病历。他们发现,有很大比例的样本被送去进行病理分析:51%分别有90%的水囊切除术和精囊切除术标本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号