• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Natural hazards and earth system sciences >Floodplain conflicts: Regulation and negotiation
【24h】

Floodplain conflicts: Regulation and negotiation

机译：洪泛区冲突：监管与谈判

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the continuing shift from engineered solutions towards more holistic methods of managing flood risk, spatial planning has become the primary focus of a conflict between land and water, water and people. In attempting to strike a balance between making space for water and making space for people, compromises are required. Through five case studies in the UK, this paper analyses the effectiveness of Planning Policy Statement 25 (PPS 25) and the processes of negotiation that it promotes. This assessment allows us to draw conclusions on the nature of the compromises this kind of negotiation can achieve and the implications of this for flood risk management. What emerges is that the beneficial impacts of decisions to develop floodplain areas are given a proper hearing and sensible conditions imposed, rather than arguments to prevent such development remaining unchallenged.
机译：在从工程解决方案向管理洪水风险的更全面方法的不断转变中，空间规划已成为土地与水，水与人之间冲突的主要焦点。为了在腾出水的空间和腾出空间的人之间寻求平衡，需​​要折衷。通过英国的五个案例研究，本文分析了《规划政策声明25》（PPS 25）的有效性及其促进的谈判过程。这项评估使我们能够得出关于这种谈判可以达成的妥协性质的结论，以及对洪水风险管理的影响。出现的结果是，对开发洪泛区的决策的有利影响给予了适当的听证和合理的条件，而不是阻止这种发展不受挑战的论据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号