首页> 外文期刊>Biology & philosophy >The primal path to kinship: a critical review of Bernard Chapais, Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society
【24h】

The primal path to kinship: a critical review of Bernard Chapais, Primeval Kinship: How Pair-Bonding Gave Birth to Human Society

机译:通往亲属关系的主要途径:伯纳德·恰帕斯(Bernard Chapais)的评论,《原始亲属关系:成对结对人类社会的诞生》

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Like other major aspects of sociality, kinship receives distinctive treatments from biologists and anthropologists. For anthropologists, the study of kinship has traditionally been an arena for documenting cultural diversity, and about finding patterns in the midst of, and trajectories through, that diversity. Throughout most of anthropology’s disciplinary history, kinship was thought to hold at least one key to understanding human cultures, both to how those cultures are related to one another and to understanding the structure and function of other large-scale cultural institutions, such as those associated with religion or economic exchange. By contrast, mention kinship to your average biologist and you’ll likely be directed to research focused on Hymnoptera and Termita, and models addressing general evolutionary puzzles-for example, the problem of evolutionary altruism and the phenomenon of reproductive specialization-that have been applied paradigmatically to the social insects, with secondary applications to creatures more obviously like us, such as mammals in general and nonhuman primates in particular.
机译:像社会的其他主要方面一样,亲属关系受到生物学家和人类学家的独特对待。对于人类学家而言,对亲属关系的研究历来是记录文化多样性以及寻找在这种多样性中的形态和发展轨迹的舞台。在人类学的大多数学科历史中,亲属关系至少被认为是理解人类文化的一种关键,既可以理解人类文化之间的相互关系,也可以理解其他大型文化机构的结构和功能,例如与人类相关的文化。与宗教或经济交流。相比之下,向普通生物学家提及亲属关系,您很可能将注意力集中在针对翅翅目和Termita的研究上,以及针对一般进化难题的模型(例如,进化利他主义问题和生殖专业化现象)已应用对社会昆虫而言是范式化的,对像我们这样更明显的生物,如一般的哺乳动物,尤其是非人类的灵长类动物,有次级应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号