...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Nordic journal of psychiatry. >Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research.
【24h】

Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research.

机译：精神卫生研究中书目数据库的覆盖范围。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

BACKGROUND: Electronic bibliographic databases are important tools when searching for medical information. The selected databases have an important effect on the potential results achieved. Studies about comparison of databases provide useful information to help determine which databases or set of databases are useful for a particular topic. AIMS: The aim of this study is to examine the coverage and overlap of three commonly used databases in mental health research. METHODS: We performed systematic database searches on four topics (ADHD prevalence, schizotypal personality, brain MRI studies in schizophrenia, recovery in schizophrenia) in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO). We also studied the effect of publication year and language on database coverage. RESULTS: PubMed was the most comprehensive database in ADHD (85% coverage of total results of the three databases) and MRI studies (71%), whereas PsycINFO was most effective in recovery (62%) and schizotypal personality (72%). The most comprehensive combination of two databases found 77-94% of the articles on the different topics. Publication year and language affected the coverage in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: When choosing databases, the extent of coverage and topic should be taken into account, as there is no single database that covers all information needs. In the case of interdisciplinary topics, the Web of Science or PsycINFO should be considered; PsycINFO should be included especially on topics related to psychology. The use of several relevant bibliographic databases, including others than those used here, is recommended.
机译：背景：电子书目数据库是搜索医学信息时的重要工具。选定的数据库对可能取得的结果有重要影响。有关数据库比较的研究提供了有用的信息，以帮助确定哪些数据库或一组数据库对特定主题有用。目的：本研究的目的是检查心理健康研究中三个常用数据库的覆盖范围和重叠程度。方法：我们在三个数据库（PubMed，Web of Science和PsycINFO）中对四个主题（ADHD患病率，精神分裂型人格，精神分裂症的脑MRI研究，精神分裂症的恢复）进行了系统的数据库搜索。我们还研究了出版年份和语言对数据库覆盖率的影响。结果：PubMed是ADHD（三个数据库的总结果覆盖率的85％）和MRI研究（71％）中最全面的数据库，而PsycINFO在康复（62％）和精神分裂型人格（72％）方面最有效。两个数据库的最全面组合发现了77-94％的有关不同主题的文章。出版年份和语言在某些情况下影响了报道的范围。结论：选择数据库时，应考虑覆盖范围和主题，因为没有一个数据库可以满足所有信息需求。对于跨学科主题，应考虑使用Web of Science或PsycINFO。 PsycINFO应该特别包含在与心理学有关的主题上。建议使用几个相关的书目数据库，包括此处未使用的数据库。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号